Predicting Environmental Demand and Secondary Task Engagement using Vehicle Kinematics from Naturalistic Driving Data
Authors
In this paper, we focus on exploiting the vehicle kinematic signals from a naturalistic driving dataset to estimate motor control difficulty associated with the driving environment (i.e., curvature and poor surface condition), and detect whether the driver was engaged in a secondary task or not. Advanced driver assistance systems can exploit such driver behavior models to better support the driving task and improve safety. Hidden Markov models were built from sequential data; lateral (x-axis) and longitudinal (y-axis) acceleration were used to classify motor control difficulty (lower vs. higher), whereas GPS speed and steering wheel position were used to classify secondary task engagement (yes vs. no). The resulting accuracy for lower motor control difficulty classification was 72.03%, whereas 71.27% was achieved for higher motor control difficulty. Cases of engagement in secondary task vs. not were classified with 84.4% and 74.0% accuracy, respectively.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
P9 - Designing a Guardian Angel: Giving an Automated Vehicle the Possibility to Override its Driver
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers’ Behaviour in Level 3 Automated Vehicles
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 67%
Exploring Passenger-Automated Vehicle Negotiation Utilizing Large Language Models for Natural Interaction
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 60%
Work with AI and Work for AI: Autonomous Vehicle Safety Drivers’ Lived Experiences
CHI '23· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Trust and Visual Focus in Automated Vehicles: A Comparative Study of Beginner and Experienced Drivers
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Assessing Public Perception of Self-Driving Cars: the Autonomous Vehicle Acceptance Model
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Why Do You Like To Drive Automated? A Context-Dependent Analysis of Highly Automated Driving to Elaborate Requirements for Intelligent User Interfaces
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Intelligent Tutoring in a Driving Simulator: Enhancing Driving Proficiency With AI-Driven Skill Assessment and Personalized Coaching Generation
IUI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 60%
Calibration of Trust Expectancies in Conditionally Automated Driving by Brand, Reliability Information and Introductionary Videos: An Online Study
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Cooperative Overtaking: Overcoming Automated Vehicles' Obstructed Sensor Range via Driver Help
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)