Improving Driver Engagement with Level 2 Automated Systems: The Impact of Fully Shared Longitudinal Control
According to the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), in Level 2 systems (L2 systems), the system executes the longitudinal and lateral control of the vehicle, with the driver required to monitor the environment and intervene when necessary. To further improve safety and driver engagement, we compared a fully shared longitudinal control system, which permits speed adjustments via acceleration and braking without deactivation, with a conventional system that disengages upon braking. In a simulator study involving 61 participants, both systems were well-received in terms of acceptance and user experience. The fully shared longitudinal control led to more frequent and earlier braking, suggesting anticipatory driving, without compromising perceived safety. Furthermore, it outperformed in hedonic qualities of user experience, and elicited a stronger intention to use. Our findings indicate that fully shared longitudinal control can enhance driver engagement, offering a valuable improvement for L2 automated systems.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
You Shall Not Pass: Warning Drivers of Unsafe Overtaking Maneuvers on Country Roads by Predicting Safe Sight Distance
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Crying Jaywalker! Notifying Take-Over-Requests and Critical Events in Operational Driving Domain of Autonomous Vehicles via Multimodal Interfaces
IUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Steering Away from Automotive HMI De Facto Standards – The Effect on Control Discoverability
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
One Size Does Not Fit All: Designing and Evaluating Criticality-Adaptive Displays in Highly Automated Vehicles
CHI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
ProVoice: Designing Proactive Functionality for In-Vehicle Conversational Assistants using Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization to Enhance Driver Experience
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
A Framework for Adapting In-Car Touchscreen Interfaces to Driver Behaviors, Perception, and Cognition
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing Interfaces
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
MIRAGE: Enabling Real-Time Automotive Mediated Reality
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Adaptive Bounded-Rationality Modeling of Early-Stage Takeover in Shared-Control Driving
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)