You Shall Not Pass: Warning Drivers of Unsafe Overtaking Maneuvers on Country Roads by Predicting Safe Sight Distance

Honorable Mention
Automated Driving Interface & Takeover DesignHead-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)Automotive Manufacturers & Vehicle DesignersAutonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers

Research Background and Issues

  • Identified Problems or Challenges: Overtaking on rural roads is a high-risk driving maneuver, primarily due to the inability to accurately assess the presence of oncoming traffic and the limitations of current vehicle sensor ranges. These overtaking-related accidents can lead to severe traffic collisions.
  • Significance: Overtaking-related accidents are a major safety concern on rural roads. The United Nations' global road safety initiative (UN General Assembly Resolution 74/299) calls for halving the number of deaths and injuries caused by traffic accidents by 2030.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work: To improve driving safety, existing technical assistance systems rely on vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) or vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication, but these technologies are not yet widely adopted. Some existing overtaking assistant systems require advanced sensors (e.g., long-range radar), which exceed the capabilities of current vehicle sensors.

Solution

  • Proposed Method or Solution: The authors developed an overtaking warning assistant system based on existing onboard sensors, utilizing vehicle speed, acceleration, and 3D map data to predict safe sight distances and provide warnings to drivers before overtaking maneuvers.
  • Innovations: Unlike existing solutions that require high-end communication or sensors, this system operates within the range of current sensors and introduces an assistant model designed to enhance driver decision-making without requiring vehicle automation.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
    1. Sight Distance Prediction Model: A model for safe overtaking sight distance was established by analyzing vehicle dynamics, including acceleration modeling and dynamic safety distance calculations in traffic scenarios.
    2. User Interface Design: Two distinct user interface (UI) modes were developed:
      • Monitoring Mode (Monitoring-focused UI): A simplified interface displaying only whether a warning is present.
      • Planning Mode (Scheduling-focused UI): Builds on monitoring mode by adding data about the next overtaking opportunity (e.g., distance calculations).
    3. Experiment and Evaluation: User experience testing was conducted in a virtual reality driving simulator to determine which UI mode was more acceptable to drivers and improved safety.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Outcomes:
    • Developed an overtaking warning system capable of operating based on a reliable sight distance prediction model, offering two UI options for comparison.
    • Virtual reality experimental testing revealed that both UI modes effectively encouraged drivers to adopt more patient driving strategies.
  • Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
    • Does not require additional high-end sensors or communication technologies.
    • Focuses on enhancing driver judgment rather than automating overtaking maneuvers.
    • The algorithm is transparently disclosed, allowing further improvement of the sight distance prediction model.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:
    • The "Monitoring Mode" scored significantly higher than the "Planning Mode" in System Usability Scale (SUS) tests.
    • Drivers using the assistant system followed preceding vehicles for longer durations compared to baseline conditions, reducing the tendency for risky overtaking.
    • Overall workload was significantly reduced when the warning function was active.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:
    • The current sight distance prediction model still exhibits errors in certain scenarios, particularly in predicting the "point-of-no-return."
    • UI preferences vary among individuals. While "Monitoring Mode" is simple and intuitive, "Planning Mode" may be appealing due to its provision of additional contextual information.
    • The system does not account for adverse weather conditions (e.g., rain, snow, fog) or low-light environments. Future research could explore the system's reliability under different environmental conditions.
    • The system cannot directly detect oncoming vehicles; future iterations could integrate more real-time detection sensors.
    • In real-world applications, HUDs may face information overload issues. Integrating the UI into standard vehicle dashboards is necessary.

Through this study, the authors demonstrate a potential prototype for an overtaking assistance system on rural roads and validate its potential through user research. There remains room for improvement and expansion in future work.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/189171/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713768
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design, Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS)
work
Professions
Automotive Manufacturers & Vehicle Designers, Autonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers