Crying Jaywalker! Notifying Take-Over-Requests and Critical Events in Operational Driving Domain of Autonomous Vehicles via Multimodal Interfaces
Authors
The advent of self-driving cars promises to enable occupants to repurpose commuting time. However, although in conditional automation (SAE Level 3) drivers can engage in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), they must be ready to intervene when prompted by the system with a take-over request (TOR). The vehicle may also need to warn the driver about critical events without notifying a TOR (as in sudden hard braking due to a jaywalker). Clearly and effectively communicating these events and their urgency is crucial for the successful adoption of autonomous vehicles. This work analyzes the impact of multimodal visual and audio cues in conveying this information. It considers an augmented reality (AR) windshield display (WSD) combining screen-fixed elements and world-registered AR overlays, alongside an auditory interface providing explanations and alerts through speech and abstract sounds. The effectiveness of these combined stimuli was evaluated through a user study conducted in a VR-based driving simulator.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- In SAE Level 3 (conditional automation) driving, how can the importance and urgency of emergency events (e.g., pedestrian intrusion) be effectively communicated?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can multimodal methods combining visual cues and voice notifications improve drivers' understanding and trust of emergency events?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do different notification modes (visual, voice, multimodal) affect drivers' multitasking ability and event perception?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- When autonomous vehicles encounter emergencies, drivers easily overlook or misinterpret notification urgency.Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
You Shall Not Pass: Warning Drivers of Unsafe Overtaking Maneuvers on Country Roads by Predicting Safe Sight Distance
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Steering Away from Automotive HMI De Facto Standards – The Effect on Control Discoverability
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 100%
Improving Driver Engagement with Level 2 Automated Systems: The Impact of Fully Shared Longitudinal Control
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
One Size Does Not Fit All: Designing and Evaluating Criticality-Adaptive Displays in Highly Automated Vehicles
CHI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
Actual Achieved Gain and Optimal Perceived Gain: Modeling Human Take-over Decisions Towards Automated Vehicles' Suggestions
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
ProVoice: Designing Proactive Functionality for In-Vehicle Conversational Assistants using Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization to Enhance Driver Experience
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
A Framework for Adapting In-Car Touchscreen Interfaces to Driver Behaviors, Perception, and Cognition
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
From Awareness to Intent: Mitigating Silent Driving System Failures through Prospective Situation Awareness Enhancing Interfaces
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
MIRAGE: Enabling Real-Time Automotive Mediated Reality
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Adaptive Bounded-Rationality Modeling of Early-Stage Takeover in Shared-Control Driving
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)