Communication of Uncertainty Information in Cooperative, Automated Driving: A Comparative Study of Different Modalities
Authors
Cooperation between drivers and automated vehicles requires transparent communication of the automation's current status. This can be achieved by communicating confidence or certainty in its current perception or decision. We evaluate different sensory modalities for communicating information about how safely an automated driving system can perform the driving task in critical traffic situations to a driver who is present as a cooperator. We aimed to improve communication between the driving system and the human driver, ultimately increasing the overall driving experience and performance. In a virtual reality driving simulation study with 34 participants, we presented confidence information across three modalities: visual, auditory, and vibrotactile, compared to a baseline condition. Our results indicate that communicating automation uncertainty through the auditory and vibrotactile modalities improved user experience, trust in automation, and perceived safety. At the same time, interactions with the Non-Driving Related Task were reduced by communicating confidence information in critical driving situations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Increasing the User Experience in Autonomous Driving through different Feedback Modalities
IUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers’ Behaviour in Level 3 Automated Vehicles
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 75%
Unimodal and Multimodal Signals to Support Control Transitions in Semiautonomous Vehicles
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
Conveying Uncertainties Using Peripheral Awareness Displays in the Context of Automated Driving
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Trust and Visual Focus in Automated Vehicles: A Comparative Study of Beginner and Experienced Drivers
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Decoding Driver Intention Cues: Exploring Non-verbal Communication for Human-Centered Automotive Interfaces
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Evaluating In-Car Tasks’ Distraction Effects with Drive-In Lab
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Understanding User Requirements for Creating Sensor-Powered Smart Car Cabins Through Retrofitting
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Understanding Driving Distractions: A Multimodal Analysis on Distraction Characterization
IUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 60%
Effects of Urgency and Cognitive Load on Modality Usage in Highly Automated Vehicles
MobileHCI '23· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)