Effects of Urgency and Cognitive Load on Modality Usage in Highly Automated Vehicles
Authors
In highly automated vehicles, passengers can engage in non-driving-related activities. Additionally, the technical advancement allows for novel interaction possibilities such as voice, gesture, gaze, touch, or multimodal interaction, both to refer to in-vehicle and outside objects (e.g., thermostat or restaurant). This interaction can be characterized by levels of urgency (e.g., based on late detection of objects) and cognitive load (e.g., because of watching a movie or working). Therefore, we implemented a Virtual Reality simulation and conducted a within-subjects study with N=11 participants evaluating the effects of urgency and cognitive load on modality usage in automated vehicles. We found that while all modalities were possible to use, participants relied on touch the most. This was followed by gaze, especially for external referencing. This work helps to further understand multimodal interaction and the requirements this poses on natural interaction in (automated) vehicles.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Matching Explanation Detail to Scene Complexity: Studying Situational Awareness-Specific AI Feedback in Pedestrian Encounter Driving Scenarios
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 75%
Increasing the User Experience in Autonomous Driving through different Feedback Modalities
IUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
Unimodal and Multimodal Signals to Support Control Transitions in Semiautonomous Vehicles
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 75%
Conveying Uncertainties Using Peripheral Awareness Displays in the Context of Automated Driving
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Communicating Awareness and Intent in Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction
CHI '18· External HMI (eHMI) — Communication with Pedestrians & Cyclists +1
- 60%
Decoding Driver Intention Cues: Exploring Non-verbal Communication for Human-Centered Automotive Interfaces
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Evaluating In-Car Tasks’ Distraction Effects with Drive-In Lab
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Understanding User Requirements for Creating Sensor-Powered Smart Car Cabins Through Retrofitting
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Understanding Driving Distractions: A Multimodal Analysis on Distraction Characterization
IUI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 60%
Do Drivers have Preconceived Ideas about an Automated Vehicle’s Driving Behaviour?
AutoUI '23· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)