Clarify: Improving Model Robustness With Natural Language Corrections
Authors
The standard way to teach models is by feeding them lots of data. However, this approach often teaches models incorrect ideas because they pick up on misleading signals in the data. To prevent such misconceptions, we must necessarily provide additional information beyond the training data. Prior methods incorporate additional instance-level supervision, such as labels for misleading features or additional labels for debiased data. However, such strategies require a large amount of labeler effort. We hypothesize that people are good at providing textual feedback at the concept level, a capability that existing teaching frameworks do not leverage. We propose Clarify, a novel interface and method for interactively correcting model misconceptions. Through Clarify, users need only provide a short text description of a model's consistent failure patterns. Then, in an entirely automated way, we use such descriptions to improve the training process. Clarify is the first end-to-end system for user model correction. Our user studies show that non-expert users can successfully describe model misconceptions via Clarify, leading to increased worst-case performance in two datasets. We additionally conduct a case study on a large-scale image dataset, ImageNet, using Clarify to find and rectify 31 novel hard subpopulations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 71%
Gamut: A Design Probe to Understand How Data Scientists Understand Machine Learning Models
CHI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
No Explainability without Accountability: An Empirical Study of Explanations and Feedback in Interactive ML
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
ESCAPE: Countering Systematic Errors from Machine's Blind Spots via Interactive Visual Analysis
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistency
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-Making
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI Advice
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
“I Don’t Think RAI Applies to My Model” – Engaging Non-champions with Sticky Stories for Responsible AI Work
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 71%
Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace Adjustments
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
Belief Updating and Delegation in Multi-Task Human–AI Interaction: Evidence from Controlled Simulations
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)