PrISM-Tracker: A Framework for Multimodal Procedure Tracking Using Wearable Sensors and State Transition Information with User-Driven Handling of Errors and Uncertainty
Authors
A user often needs training and guidance while performing several daily life procedures, e.g., cooking, setting up a new appliance, or doing a COVID test. Watch-based human activity recognition (HAR) can track users' actions during these procedures. However, out of the box, state-of-the-art HAR struggles from noisy data and less-expressive actions that are often part of daily life tasks. This paper proposes PrISM-Tracker, a procedure-tracking framework that augments existing HAR models with (1) graph-based procedure representation and (2) a user-interaction module to handle model uncertainty. Specifically, PrISM-Tracker extends a Viterbi algorithm to update state probabilities based on time-series HAR outputs by leveraging the graph representation that embeds time information as prior. Moreover, the model identifies moments or classes of uncertainty and asks the user for guidance to improve tracking accuracy. We tested PrISM-Tracker in two procedures: latte-making in an engineering lab study and wound care for skin cancer patients at a clinic. The results showed the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm utilizing transition graphs in tracking steps and the efficacy of using simulated human input to enhance performance. This work is the first step toward human-in-the-loop intelligent systems for guiding users while performing new and complicated procedural tasks. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569504
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can efficient real-time process tracking be achieved through wearable sensors and multimodal data?Category: Care, Health, and Task-Step Activity RecognitionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can state transition graph models improve human activity recognition (HAR) accuracy under noise and uncertainty?Category: Care, Health, and Task-Step Activity RecognitionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can user input (e.g., voice feedback) effectively improve model performance, and to what extent does it affect user burden?Category: Care, Health, and Task-Step Activity RecognitionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users lack effective tools to track and prompt steps in real time during complex tasks.Category: Care, Health, and Task-Step Activity RecognitionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Remote Breathing Rate Tracking in Stationary Position Using the Motion and Acoustic Sensors of Earables
CHI '23· Biosensors & Physiological Monitoring
- 75%
mP-Gait: Fine-grained Parkinson's Disease Gait Impairment Assessment with Robust Feature Analysis
UbiComp '24· Human Pose & Activity Recognition
- 60%
Assessing Severity of Pulmonary Obstruction from Respiration Phase-Based Wheeze-Sensing Using Mobile Sensors
CHI '20· Telemedicine & Remote Patient Monitoring +1
- 60%
'Are They Doing Better In The Clinic Or At Home': Understanding Clinicians? Needs When Visualizing Wearable Sensor Data Used In Remote Gait Assessments For People With Multiple Sclerosis
CHI '22· Medical & Scientific Data Visualization +1
- 60%
IMUPoser: Full-Body Pose Estimation using IMUs in Phones, Watches, and Earbuds
CHI '23· Human Pose & Activity Recognition +1
- 60%
LoEar: Push the Range Limit of Acoustic Sensing for Vital Sign Monitoring
UbiComp '23· Sleep & Stress Monitoring +1
- 60%
Auto-Gait: Automatic Ataxia Risk Assessment with Computer Vision from Gait Task Videos
UbiComp '23· Human Pose & Activity Recognition +1
- 60%
mmArrhythmia: Contactless Arrhythmia Detection via mmWave Sensing
UbiComp '24· Biosensors & Physiological Monitoring
- 60%
ChairPose: Pressure-based Chair Morphology Grounded Sitting Pose Estimation through Simulation-Assisted Training
UIST '25· Human Pose & Activity Recognition +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)