Technical Design Space Analysis for Unobtrusive Driver Emotion Assessment Using Multi-Domain Context
Authors
Driver emotions play a vital role in driving safety and performance. Consequently, regulating driver emotions through empathic interfaces have been investigated thoroughly. However, the prerequisite - driver emotion sensing - is a challenging endeavor: Body-worn physiological sensors are intrusive, while facial and speech recognition only capture overt emotions. In a user study (N=27), we investigate how emotions can be unobtrusively predicted by analyzing a rich set of contextual features captured by a smartphone, including road and traffic conditions, visual scene analysis, audio, weather information, and car speed. We derive a technical design space to inform practitioners and researchers about the most indicative sensing modalities, the corresponding impact on users' privacy, and the computational cost associated with processing this data. Our analysis shows that contextual emotion recognition is significantly more robust than facial recognition, leading to an overall improvement of 7% using a leave-one-participant-out cross-validation. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569466
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can smartphones enable non-invasive driver emotion assessment in driving contexts?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What is the contribution of multimodal contextual data (e.g., environment, audio, and visual features) to emotion classification?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can smartphone sensing capabilities replace in-vehicle hardware for efficient recognition of implicit emotions?Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Driver emotions affect driving safety, but existing technologies struggle to recognize implicit emotions at low cost and high efficiency.Category: Driving Support and Safety Decision-MakingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
The Insurer's Paradox: About Liability, the Need for Accident Data, and Legal Hurdles for Automated Driving
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
What a Driver Wants: User Preferences in Semi-Autonomous Vehicle Decision-Making
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
Is Too Much System Caution Counterproductive? Effects of Varying Sensitivity and Automation Levels in Vehicle Collision Avoidance Systems
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
All-inclusive TORs: Cross-Cultural and Age-Sensitive Design for Take-Over Requests in Level 3 Cars
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
Improving Take-Over Quality in Automated Driving By Interrupting Non-Driving Tasks
IUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
The Real T(h)OR: Evaluation of Emergency Take-Over on a Test Track
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
No Risk No Trust: Investigating Perceived Risk in Highly Automated Driving
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
Who Has The Right of Way, Automated Vehicles or Drivers? Multiple Perspectives in Safety, Negotiation and Trust
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
- 60%
Need for Trust Calibration in Takeover request Performance in Level 3 Automated vehicles
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)