User Modelling for Avoiding Overfitting in Interactive Knowledge Elicitation for Prediction
Authors
In human-in-the-loop machine learning, the user provides information beyond that in the training data. Many algorithms and user interfaces have been designed to optimize and facilitate this human-machine interaction; however, fewer studies have addressed the potential defects the designs can cause. Effective interaction often requires exposing the user to the training data or its statistics. The design of the system is then critical, as this can lead to double use of data and overfitting, if the user reinforces noisy patterns in the data. We propose a user modelling methodology, by assuming simple rational behaviour, to correct the problem. We show, in a user study with 48 participants, that the method improves predictive performance in a sparse linear regression sentiment analysis task, where graded user knowledge on feature relevance is elicited. We believe that the key idea of inferring user knowledge with probabilistic user models has general applicability in guarding against overfitting and improving interactive machine learning.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
DxHF: Providing High-Quality Human Feedback for LLM Alignment with Interactive Decomposition
UIST '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Plurals: A System for Guiding LLMs via Simulated Social Ensembles
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Think Together and Work Better: Combining Humans' and LLMs' Think-Aloud Outcomes for Effective Text Evaluation
CHI '25· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 80%
Which Contributions Deserve Credit? Perceptions of Attribution in Human-AI Co-Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Behavioral Indicators of Overreliance During Interaction with Conversational Language Models
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Co-Disclosing the Computer: LLM-Mediated Computing through Reflective Conversation
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
What can AI do for me: Evaluating Machine Learning Interpretations in Cooperative Play
IUI '19· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
User Reliance on AI Support for Collaborative Partner Selection
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 75%
Conversational Explanations: Discussing Explainable AI with Non-AI Experts
IUI '25· Explainable AI (XAI)
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)