SCSimulator: An Exploratory Visual Analytics Framework for Partner Selection in Supply Chains through LLM-driven Multi-Agent Simulation
Authors
Supply chains (SCs), complex networks spanning from raw material acquisition to product delivery, with enterprises as interconnected nodes, play a pivotal role in organizational success. However, optimizing SCs remains challenging, particularly in partner selection, a key bottleneck shaped by both competitive and cooperative dynamics. This challenge inherently constitutes a multi-objective dynamic game requiring a synergistic integration of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and Game Theory (GT). Traditional approaches, grounded in mathematical simplifications and managerial heuristics, often fail to capture real-world intricacies and risk introducing subjective biases. Multi-agent simulation (MAS) offers promise, but prior research has largely relied on fixed, uniform agent logic, limiting practical applicability. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) create new opportunities to represent complex SC requirements and hybrid game logic. However, challenges persist in modeling dynamic SC relationships, ensuring interpretability, and balancing agent autonomy with expert control. To address these issues, we present SCSimulator, an exploratory visual analytics framework that integrates LLM-driven MAS with human-in-the-loop collaboration for SC partner selection. SCSimulator simulates SC evolution via adaptive network structures and enterprise behaviors, which are visualized via interpretable interfaces. By combining Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning with explainable AI (XAI) techniques, the framework generates multi-faceted, transparent explanations of decision trade-offs. Users can iteratively adjust simulation settings to explore outcomes aligned with their expectations and strategic priorities. Developed through iterative co-design with SC experts and industry managers, SCSimulator serves as a proof-of-concept, offering both methodological contributions and practical insights for future research on SC decision-making and interactive AI-driven analytics. Usage scenarios and a user study further demonstrate the system's effectiveness and usability.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
PleaSQLarify: Visual Pragmatic Repair for Natural Language Database Querying
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 100%
Improving Steering and Verification in AI-Assisted Data Analysis with Interactive Task Decomposition
UIST '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 86%
VeriPlan: Integrating Formal Verification and LLMs into End-User Planning
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 86%
Lexara: A User-Centered Toolkit for Evaluating Large Language Models for Conversational Visual Analytics
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
How Do Analysts Understand and Verify AI-Assisted Data Analyses?
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Jupybara: Operationalizing a Design Space for Actionable Data Analysis and Storytelling with LLMs
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Dango: A Mixed-Initiative Data Wrangling System using Large Language Model
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Results-Actionability Gap: Understanding How Practitioners Evaluate LLM Products in the Wild
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
DataSpeck: An AI-Driven Human-in-the-Loop System for Automating Transformations in Data Conversion Workflows
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Cerebra: Aligning Implicit Knowledge in Interactive SQL Authoring
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)