ChoiceMates: Supporting Unfamiliar Online Decision-Making with Multi-Agent Conversational Interactions
Authors
From purchasing a gift to deciding on a hobby, unfamiliar decisions---decisions without domain knowledge and experience---are frequent and significant. The complexity and uncertainty of such decisions demand unique approaches to information seeking, understanding, and decision-making. Our formative study highlights that in the current workflow, users want to start by discovering broad and relevant domain information evenly and simultaneously, quickly address emerging inquiries, and gain personalized standards to assess information found. We present ChoiceMates, an interactive multi-agent system designed to address these needs by enabling users to engage with a dynamic set of LLM agents each presenting a unique experience in the domain. Unlike existing multi-agent systems that automate tasks with agents, the user orchestrates agents to assist their decision-making process in each turn, through chatting with all agents, with a tagged subset of agents, or calling in new agents into the space. By comparing ChoiceMates with a web search condition and a multi-agent framework (n=12), we show that ChoiceMates enables a more confident, satisfactory decision-making with better situation understanding than web search, and higher decision quality than a commercial multi-agent framework. We further illustrate how participants utilized ChoiceMates to make unfamiliar decisions, providing insights into designing a more controllable and collaborative multi-agent system.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
"If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" – How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishment
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
"It would work for me too": How Online Communities Shape Software Developers’ Trust in AI-Powered Code Generation Tools
IUI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
Generative Trigger-Action Programming with Ply
UIST '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 71%
Adapting User Interfaces with Model-based Reinforcement Learning
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
ChainBuddy: An AI-assisted Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 71%
Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming Support
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
PointAloud: An Interaction Suite for AI-Supported Pointer-Centric Think-Aloud Computing
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitioners
CHI '26· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +2
- 71%
State Your Intention to Steer Your Attention: An AI Assistant for Intentional Digital Living
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Fit Matters: Format–Distance Alignment Improves Conversational Search
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)