"It would work for me too": How Online Communities Shape Software Developers’ Trust in AI-Powered Code Generation Tools
Authors
Ruijia Cheng
Ruotong Wang
Thomas Zimmermann
Denae Ford
While revolutionary AI-powered code generation tools have been rising rapidly, we know little about how and how to help software developers form appropriate trust in those AI tools. Through a two-phase formative study, we investigate how online communities shape developers’ trust in AI tools and how we can leverage community features to facilitate appropriate user trust. Through interviewing 17 developers, we find that developers collectively make sense of AI tools using the experiences shared by community members and leverage community signals to evaluate AI suggestions. We then surface design opportunities and conduct 11 design probe sessions to explore the design space of using community features to support user trust in AI code generation systems. We synthesize our findings and extend an existing model of user trust in AI technologies with sociotechnical factors. We map out the design considerations for integrating user community into the AI code generation experience.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
"If the Machine Is As Good As Me, Then What Use Am I?" – How the Use of ChatGPT Changes Young Professionals' Perception of Productivity and Accomplishment
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 100%
Generative Trigger-Action Programming with Ply
UIST '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
Adapting User Interfaces with Model-based Reinforcement Learning
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
ChainBuddy: An AI-assisted Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 83%
Assistance or Disruption? Exploring and Evaluating the Design and Trade-offs of Proactive AI Programming Support
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
PointAloud: An Interaction Suite for AI-Supported Pointer-Centric Think-Aloud Computing
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitioners
CHI '26· Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) & Neurofeedback +2
- 83%
State Your Intention to Steer Your Attention: An AI Assistant for Intentional Digital Living
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
ChoiceMates: Supporting Unfamiliar Online Decision-Making with Multi-Agent Conversational Interactions
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 83%
Whose Code Is It? How AI Autonomy Reshapes Ownership, Responsibility, and Disclosure in AI-Assisted Programming
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)