Is Conversational XAI All You Need? Human-AI Decision Making With a Conversational XAI Assistant
Authors
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods are being proposed to help interpret and understand how AI systems reach specific predictions. Inspired by prior work on conversational user interfaces, we argue that augmenting existing XAI methods with conversational user interfaces can increase user engagement and boost user understanding of the AI system. In this paper, we explored the impact of a conversational XAI interface on users’ understanding of the AI system, their trust, and reliance on the AI system. In comparison to an XAI dashboard, we found that the conversational XAI interface can bring about a better understanding of the AI system among users and higher user trust. However, users of both the XAI dashboard and conversational XAI interfaces showed clear overreliance on the AI system. Enhanced conversations powered by large language model (LLM) agents amplified over-reliance. Based on our findings, we reason that the potential cause of such overreliance is the illusion of explanatory depth that is concomitant with both XAI interfaces. Our findings have important implications for designing effective conversational XAI interfaces to facilitate appropriate reliance and improve human-AI collaboration.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do different interactive XAI interfaces affect users' understanding, trust, and appropriate reliance on AI?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How effective are evaluative dialogues in enhancing user reflection on AI recommendations and behavior optimization?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Do LLMs in conversational XAI cause users to over-rely on or over-trust AI?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to understand AI recommendations when using AI systems, potentially leading to over-trust or rejection.Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 83%
Conversation Progress Guide : UI System for Enhancing Self-Efficacy in Conversational AI
CHI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 83%
AmbigChat: Interactive Hierarchical Clarification for Ambiguous Open-Domain Question Answering
UIST '25· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 71%
Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and Overreliance
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Help me and I’ll help you: Speakers’ and listeners’ collaborative effort and the division of labour in human-agent collaborative communication
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 71%
Personal Validation Effect in LLMs: Positive AI Responses Bias Perceptions of Validity, Reliability, Personalization, and Usefulness of Fictitious Predictions
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Sensemaking in Multi-Agent LLM Interfaces: How Users Interpret Transparency and Trustworthiness Cues
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Presenting Large Language Models as Companions Affects What Mental Capacities People Attribute to Them
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
From Use to Oversight: How Mental Models Influence User Behavior and Output in AI Writing Assistants
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principles
IUI '24· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)