ShareFlows: Seamless Knowledge Capture and Proactive Push for Efficient Teacher Workflows in Higher Education
Authors
High staff turnover in higher education often burdens teachers with laborious handovers of teaching tasks every semester. To boost teachers' workflow efficiency, we present an innovative knowledge management tool that allows experienced teachers to seamlessly capture task steps (i.e., denoted as ShareFlow) that can be subsequently recommended to novices via proactive push, all happening during teachers' natural workflow to minimize disruptions. We conducted a controlled experiment with 30 participants and compared our tool against a state-of-the-art baseline knowledge management system powered by a large language model (Claude 3 Haiku). We found that our knowledge management tool reduced task completion time and improved task quality (with statistical significance). Feedback from the participants also indicated the high usability of our tool, suggesting its strong potential for practical adoption for improving teacher workflows.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can an automated knowledge management tool be designed to efficiently capture and share teachers' task experience?Category: Teacher Tools, Pedagogy, and Curriculum DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can tools that automatically capture task flows and dynamically push recommendations improve teaching task handover efficiency and quality?Category: Teacher Tools, Pedagogy, and Curriculum DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does ShareFlow improve knowledge recommendation relevance and accuracy through real-time operation consistency checking?Category: Teacher Tools, Pedagogy, and Curriculum DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- University faculty task handovers are time-consuming and manual operations are error-prone.Category: Teacher Tools, Pedagogy, and Curriculum DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)