Understanding Novice's Annotation Process For 3D Semantic Segmentation Task With Human-In-The-Loop
Authors
Large-scale 3D point clouds are often used as training data for 3D semantic segmentation, but the labor-intensive nature of the annotation process challenges the acquisition of sufficient labeled data. Meanwhile, there has been limited research on introducing novice annotators to acquire the labeled data by enhancing their annotation performance and user experience. Therefore, in this study, we explored solutions involving two dimensions: the presence of AI assistance and the number of classes visualized simultaneously in model's segmentation results in HITL. We conducted a user study with 16 novice annotators who had no prior experience in 3D semantic segmentation, asking them to perform annotation tasks. The results revealed an interaction effect between the two dimensions on annotation accuracy and labeling efficiency. We also found that displaying multiple classes at once reduced the time taken for annotation. Moreover, visualizing multiple classes at once or the absence of AI assistance led to a greater increase in model accuracy compared to our baselines. The best user experience was observed when the visualization showed a single class at a time with AI assistance. Based on these findings, we discuss which environments can enhance novice annotators' annotation performance and user experience in 3D semantic segmentation tasks within HITL contexts.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do AI assistance and different visualization methods affect novices' performance and experience in 3D point cloud semantic segmentation?Category: Machine Learning Model Visual AnalyticsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do single-category versus multi-category segmentation display modes differ in novices' annotation efficiency, accuracy, and cognitive load?Category: Machine Learning Model Visual AnalyticsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- In 3D point cloud annotation, can dynamically adjusting AI support and visualization methods optimize the speed-precision tradeoff?Category: Machine Learning Model Visual AnalyticsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Novices find 3D point cloud annotation time-consuming and difficult to ensure quality.Category: Machine Learning Model Visual AnalyticsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Opportunities for Automating Email Processing: A Need-Finding Study
CHI '19· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
- 60%
Automation: Danger or Opportunity? Designing and Assessing Automation for Interactive Systems
CHI '18· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 60%
OneLabeler: A Flexible System for Building Data Labeling Tools
CHI '22· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control
- 60%
Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic HCI Research Data: a Case Study
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Matching Mind and Method: Augmented Decision-Making with Digital Companions based on Regulatory Mode Theory
CHI '23· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
- 60%
To Use or Not to Use: Impatience and Overreliance When Using Generative AI Productivity Support Tools
CHI '25· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +1
- 60%
SummAct: Uncovering User Intentions Through Interactive Behaviour Summarisation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Divergence or Convergence? A Deep Insight into the Crowd Collaboration and its Productivity in Open Source Software based on Entropy
CHI '26· Crowdsourcing Task Design & Quality Control +1
- 60%
Navigating the Unknown: A Chat-Based Collaborative Interface for Personalized Exploratory Tasks
IUI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
The Influence of Curiosity Traits and On-Demand Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
IUI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)