Opportunities for Automating Email Processing: A Need-Finding Study
Authors
Email management consumes significant effort from senders and recipients. Some of this work might be automatable. We performed a mixed-methods need-finding study to learn: (i) what sort of automatic email handling users want, and (ii) what kinds of information and computation are needed to support that automation. Our investigation included a design workshop to identify categories of needs, a survey to better understand those categories, and a classification of existing email automation software to determine which needs have been addressed. Our results highlight the need for: a richer data model for rules, more ways to manage attention, leveraging internal and external email context, complex processing such as response aggregation, and affordances for senders. To further investigate our findings, we developed a platform for authoring small scripts over a user's inbox. Of the automations found in our studies, half are impossible in popular email clients, motivating new design directions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Automation: Danger or Opportunity? Designing and Assessing Automation for Interactive Systems
CHI '18· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 75%
Matching Mind and Method: Augmented Decision-Making with Digital Companions based on Regulatory Mode Theory
CHI '23· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
- 75%
To Use or Not to Use: Impatience and Overreliance When Using Generative AI Productivity Support Tools
CHI '25· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +1
- 75%
SummAct: Uncovering User Intentions Through Interactive Behaviour Summarisation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
Understanding Novice's Annotation Process For 3D Semantic Segmentation Task With Human-In-The-Loop
IUI '24· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 75%
The Influence of Curiosity Traits and On-Demand Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
IUI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Human-AI Interaction in Human Resource Management: Understanding Why Employees Resist Algorithmic Evaluation at Workplaces and How to Mitigate Burdens
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
Trust in Collaborative Automation in High Stakes Software Engineering Work: A Case Study at NASA
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
Competent but Rigid: Identifying the Gap in Empowering AI to Participate Equally in Group Decision-Making
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)