Taxonomy of Trust-Relevant Failures and Mitigation Strategies
Honorable MentionAuthors
We develop a taxonomy that categorizes HRI failure types and their impact on trust to structure the broad range of knowledge contributions. We further identify research gaps in order to support fellow researchers in the development of trustworthy robots. Studying trust repair in HRI has only recently been given more interest and we propose a taxonomy of potential trust violations and suitable repair strategies to support researchers during the development of interaction scenarios. The taxonomy distinguishes four failure types: Design, System, Expectation, and User failures and outlines potential mitigation strategies. Based on these failures, strategies for autonomous failure detection and repair are presented, employing explanation, verification and validation techniques. Finally, a research agenda for HRI is outlined, discussing identified gaps related to the relation of failures and HR-trust.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
When AI Joins the Negotiation Table: Evaluating AI as a Moderator
CUI '25· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +1
- 67%
Implicit Communication of Actionable Information in Human-AI teams
CHI '19· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +2
- 67%
Exploring Anthropomorphism in Conversational Agents for Environmental Sustainability
DIS '25· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 67%
Induction of an active attitude by short speech reaction time toward interaction for decision-making with multiple agents
IUI '19· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)