The AI-DEC: A Card-based Design Method for User-centered AI Explanations
Authors
Increasing evidence suggests that many deployed AI systems do not sufficiently support end-user interaction and information needs. Engaging end-users in the design of these systems can reveal user needs and expectations, yet effective ways of engaging end-users in the AI explanation design remain under-explored. To address this gap, we developed a design method, called \textit{AI-DEC}, that defines four dimensions of AI explanations that are critical to the integration of AI systems in the workplace---communication content, modality, frequency, and direction---and offers design examples for end-users to design AI explanations that meet their needs. We evaluated this method through co-design sessions with workers in healthcare, finance, and management industries who regularly use AI systems in their daily work. Findings indicate that the AI-DEC effectively supported workers in designing explanations that accommodated diverse levels of performance and autonomy needs, which varied depending on the AI system's workplace role and worker values. We discuss the implications of using the AI-DEC for the user-centered design of AI explanations in real-world systems.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 63%
No Explainability without Accountability: An Empirical Study of Explanations and Feedback in Interactive ML
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Certified But Imperfect: Investigating The Role of AI Certifications And System Performance on Trust in And Reliance on AI Systems
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
“Do I Trust the AI?” Towards Trustworthy AI-Assisted Diagnosis: Understanding User Perception in LLM-Supported Clinical Reasoning
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)