Exploring User Engagement Through an Interaction Lens: What Textual Cues Can Tell Us about Human-Chatbot Interactions
Authors
Monitoring and maintaining user engagement in human-chatbot interactions is challenging. Researchers often use cues observed in the interactions as indicators to infer engagement. However, evaluation of these cues is lacking. In this study, we collected an inventory of potential textual engagements cues from the literature, including linguistic features, utterance features, and interaction features. These cues were subsequently used to annotate a dataset of 291 user-chatbot interactions, and we examined which of these cues predicted self-reported user engagement. Our results show that engagement can indeed be recognized at the level of individual utterances. Notably, words indicating cognitive thinking processes and motivational utterances were strong indicators of engagement. An overall negative tone could also predict engagement, highlighting the importance of nuanced interpretation and contextual awareness of user utterances. Our findings demonstrated initial feasibility of recognizing utterance-level cues and using them to infer user engagement, although further validation is needed across different content-domains.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- Which fine-grained textual cues in text-based interaction can predict user engagement with chatbots?Category: Conversational Agent and Chatbot DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do these textual cues relate to users' self-reported subjective engagement experiences?Category: Conversational Agent and Chatbot DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which textual cues have stable predictive power for user engagement across different application scenarios?Category: Conversational Agent and Chatbot DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users often struggle to sustain engagement during prolonged interaction with chatbots.Category: Conversational Agent and Chatbot DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and Risks
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Impact of Model Interpretability and Outcome Feedback on Trust in AI
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Understanding How Psychological Distance Influences User Preferences in Conversational versus Web Search
CHI '25· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Chatbots as Advisers: the Effects of Response Variability and Reply Suggestion Buttons
CUI '23· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Towards an optimal dialog strategy for information retrieval using both open-ended and close-ended questions
IUI '18· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Deep Learning Uncertainty in Machine Teaching
IUI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Do people engage cognitively with AI? Impact of AI assistance on incidental learning
IUI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
TiiS: Theoretical, Measured and Subjective Responsibility in Aided Decision Making
IUI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Hierarchical Summarization for Longform Spoken Dialog
UIST '21· Conversational Chatbots +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)