Language Cues for Expressing Artificial Personality: A Systematic Literature Review for Conversational Agents
Authors
Users attribute artificial personality (AP) to conversational agents (CAs) based on perceived language respectively verbal cues. This review synthesizes studies on this topic, encompassing research not only on chat- and voicebots but also on social robots, drawing from interdisciplinary databases. This approach led to an identification of 200 verbal signals, nearly four times more as in previous reviews. The signals were classified according to the personality dimensions of the BFM as well as its facets. Besides, the relevance of theories of personality other than the BFM are discussed. Furthermore, six methodological challenges in the empirical study of verbal cues expressing AP are identified. Practical implications include providing practitioners an overview of verbal signals, while offering opportunities for research improvement based on identified challenges. Enhanced understanding of verbal signals related to AP aids in evaluating implementation quality, not only in rule-based CAs but also in LLM-based systems.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do linguistic cues affect the expression of artificial personality (e.g., AI chatbot personality)?Category: Conversational Agent Persona, Personality, and Social Trait DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What linguistic expression cues exist for each dimension of the Big Five personality model?Category: Conversational Agent Persona, Personality, and Social Trait DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can existing linguistic cues be improved to enhance the user experience of artificial personality?Category: Conversational Agent Persona, Personality, and Social Trait DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to interact efficiently with conversational agents that lack authentic personality.Category: Conversational Agent Persona, Personality, and Social Trait DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 71%
Help me and I’ll help you: Speakers’ and listeners’ collaborative effort and the division of labour in human-agent collaborative communication
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 71%
From Human Pragmatic Language Skills to Conversational Agent Design: A Systematic Review of Transfer Strategies
CHI '26· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 67%
Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence
CHI '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Developing a Personality Model for Speech-based Conversational Agents Using the Psycholexical Approach
CHI '20· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +1
- 67%
User Perceptions of Extraversion in Chatbots after Repeated Use
CHI '22· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
Apple’s Knowledge Navigator: Why Doesn’t that Conversational Agent Exist Yet?
CHI '24· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 67%
BigBlueBot: Teaching Strategies for Successful Human-Agent Interactions
IUI '19· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 63%
When Nobody Around Is Real: Exploring Public Opinions and User Experiences On the Multi-Agent AI Social Platform
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +3
- 63%
A Design Space for Intelligent Dialogue Augmentation
IUI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)