A Design Space for Intelligent Dialogue Augmentation
Authors
The use of intelligent agents in communication is a growing trend aimed at enhancing the efficiency and quality of interactions. As such, \emph{dialogue augmentation systems}---text processing systems that interactively enhance ongoing written or spoken communication---are gaining significant popularity across domains. While technical limitations had previously inhibited their real-time usage for effective communication augmentation, recent developments in language processing have improved their capabilities to contribute to dialogue as intelligent, emancipated, and proactive agents. While other works on dialogue augmentation focus on evaluating design considerations for specific applications of these systems, we lack a unified understanding of the broader design principles that apply to dialogue more generally. Through a literature review and mixed-methods analysis of 78 existing systems, we iteratively define a comprehensive design space for intelligent dialogue augmentation systems. To further ground our analysis, we interweave Clark's models of dialogue with concepts in human-AI collaboration and discuss trends in the evolving role of dialogue augmentation systems along five dimensions---dialogue context, augmentation context, task, interaction, and model. Based on the identified trends, we discuss concrete challenges for broader adoption, highlighting the need to design \emph{trusted}, \emph{seamless}, \emph{timely}, and \emph{accessible} augmentations. The design space contributes as a mechanism for researchers to facilitate defining design choices during development, situate their systems in the current landscape of works, and understand opportunities for future research.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can a systematic design space be built to guide intelligent conversational augmentation system development?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which design dimensions and categories can cover key issues in complex multi-party dialogue and drive unified technological development?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can intelligent conversational augmentation systems achieve human-AI collaboration and improve interaction efficiency across diverse scenarios?Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Multi-party dialogue suffers from unequal participation, difficult information organization, and insufficient support for language-barrier groups.Category: Multi-User, Group Chat, and Multi-Party Dialogue CollaborationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 86%
Help me and I’ll help you: Speakers’ and listeners’ collaborative effort and the division of labour in human-agent collaborative communication
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 75%
When Nobody Around Is Real: Exploring Public Opinions and User Experiences On the Multi-Agent AI Social Platform
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +3
- 71%
Debate Chatbots to Facilitate Critical Thinking on YouTube: Social Identity and Conversational Style Make A Difference
CHI '24· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 71%
AmbigChat: Interactive Hierarchical Clarification for Ambiguous Open-Domain Question Answering
UIST '25· Conversational Chatbots +1
- 63%
IdeaBot: Investigating Social Facilitation in Human-Machine Team Creativity
CHI '21· Conversational Chatbots +3
- 63%
The Illusion of Empathy? Notes on Displays of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '24· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 63%
Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot Interaction
CHI '26· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 63%
AI-exhibited Personality Traits Can Shape Human Self-concept through Conversations
CHI '26· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 63%
Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Tasks
CHI '26· Agent Personality & Anthropomorphism +2
- 63%
Presenting Large Language Models as Companions Affects What Mental Capacities People Attribute to Them
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)