Virtual and Augmented Reality for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review
Authors
Sustainable HCIClimate Change Communication ToolsEnvironmental AdvocatesHCI Researchers
Title of the Paper
Virtual and Augmented Reality for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic Information
- Subject Area: Applications of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies in Environmental Sustainability
- Keywords: Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Environmental Sustainability, Systematic Literature Review, Learning Environments, User Interaction
Research Background and Issues
- Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Environmental issues such as climate change and biodiversity loss are highly complex and challenging to communicate effectively to the public.
- Although the application of Extended Reality (XR) technologies is growing in many fields, research on their potential to promote environmental sustainability remains in its early stages, lacking systematic summaries.
- Many XR studies related to environmental issues are limited in scope, particularly in terms of experimental evidence on motivation and behavior change.
- Significance: Technologies like AR and VR can simulate realistic environmental experiences, effectively disseminating environmental information to the public, potentially influencing public behavior and emotions, and contributing positively to environmental protection.
- Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Literature reviews indicate that while XR's use in environmental education has gained attention, research on its impact on behavior change and overcoming psychological barriers is insufficient.
- Current research on XR applications in the field of environmental sustainability (ES) is fragmented and lacks a unified structural framework.
Solutions
- Methods or Solutions: This study systematically evaluates 80 articles on XR applications in the ES field, analyzing their design methods, target audiences, and corresponding research outcomes, while exploring future research directions.
- Innovations:
- Provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of methods and outcomes related to XR in the field of environmental sustainability.
- Identifies the current capabilities of XR technologies and proposes a future research agenda to address theoretical, thematic, and methodological gaps.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Screened literature following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (standards for systematic literature reviews).
- Conducted keyword searches in the Scopus database to retrieve studies related to XR and environmental sustainability.
- Used ATLAS.ti software to code and analyze extracted data, systematically categorizing effects, interaction methods, and technological applications.
Research Findings
- Specific Findings:
- XR technologies (including VR and AR) have seen rapid growth in environmental-themed research, particularly since 2018.
- Most studies focus on educational environments (e.g., classrooms, public education), with less emphasis on behavior change or enhancing connections to nature.
- Identified 31 common features of XR applications (e.g., gamification elements, immersion mechanisms, and user interaction methods) and recognized their potential value in learning and psychological applications.
- Advantages of Existing Solutions: Compared to traditional educational media, XR can more effectively enhance public awareness of environmental issues by offering immersive interactions and experimental experiences.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Research on XR's effects on learning and knowledge acquisition is the most extensive, demonstrating its ability to aid knowledge retention and contextual understanding.
- While VR has shown some positive effects on behavioral intentions and a sense of connection to nature, the long-term sustainability of these effects has not been empirically validated.
- There are related effects, such as how spatial presence influences psychological distance variables, but relevant studies are limited.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- The exact mechanisms of XR applications in the field of environmental sustainability remain unclear.
- Current research is fragmented, lacking consistent measurement standards, making it difficult to compare findings across studies.
- Future Directions:
- Expand research on XR's role in promoting behavior change and connections to nature.
- Explore the applicability of different interaction mechanisms and immersive features in XR on audience cognition and behavior.
- Conduct more comparative studies to clarify the advantages of XR technologies over other educational media.
- Pay attention to ethical implications in technology and user interaction, and investigate potential negative effects of long-term XR use.
- Limitations:
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can XR technology (AR and VR) improve public awareness of environmental issues?Category: XR Safety and Human Factors EngineeringSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can XR experiences effectively promote behavior change related to environmental protection?Category: XR Training and EducationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What mechanisms do AR and VR use to promote connection between humans and nature?Category: XR Training and EducationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- The public lacks sufficient awareness of complex environmental issues and weak motivation for behavior change.Category: XR Training and EducationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Towards User-Centred Climate Services: the Role of Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '23· Sustainable HCI +1
- 67%
Branching Foresight - A Novel Interaction Concept for AI-generated Scenario Exploration
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +3
- 67%
Climate Change Communication in HCI: a Visual Analysis of the Past Decade
C&C '21· Visualization Perception & Cognition +2
- 67%
The Disaster and Climate Change Artathon: Staging Art/Science Collaborations in Crisis Informatics
DIS '20· Sustainable HCI +2
- 60%
Have We Taken On Too Much?: A Critical Review of the Sustainable HCI Landscape
CHI '22· Sustainable HCI +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581147
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Sustainable HCI, Climate Change Communication Tools
work
Professions
Environmental Advocates, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers