Co-Designing with Early Adolescents: Understanding Perceptions of and Design Considerations for Tech-Based Mediation Strategies that Promote Technology Disengagement
Title of the Paper
Co-Designing with Early Adolescents: Understanding Perceptions and Design Considerations for Technology-Based Mediation Strategies to Promote Technology Disengagement
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Interaction between Children and Technology
- Keywords: Technology disengagement, early adolescents, co-design, technology-based mediation strategies, user experience design, parental control, self-regulation, gamification, perception design
Research Background and Problem
-
Problems and Challenges:
- Excessive use of digital technology among children has become a growing concern, particularly as early adolescents (ages 11-14) begin to seek independence, making it increasingly difficult for parents to limit their device usage.
- Although many mediation strategies exist, they often overlook children's opinions and needs, potentially leading to parent-child conflicts.
- Existing technology mediation tools are typically designed with parents as the primary stakeholders, which may lead children to perceive these tools as invasive and overly restrictive.
-
Significance:
- Excessive technology use can negatively impact children's cognitive and social development, sleep, and physical health, and in severe cases, lead to behavioral problems or technology addiction.
- Involving early adolescents in the design process may help them better accept mediation strategies and foster self-regulation skills.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Studies have shown that involving children in rule-making can encourage compliance.
- Co-Design enables direct engagement with target users (children) to design technology solutions that better meet their needs.
Solution
-
Proposed Solution:
- The authors conducted an online co-design study to involve early adolescents in the design process of technology-based mediation strategies aimed at promoting healthy technology use behaviors.
- The study focuses on understanding how early adolescents perceive the issue of excessive technology use, the mediation solutions they can design, and the design elements they consider important.
-
Innovative Aspects:
- Using a co-design approach to directly involve early adolescents in the design process, ensuring the solutions more accurately reflect user needs.
- Exploring the use of online collaborative tools (e.g., Google Jamboard, Zoom) to design technology mediation solutions tailored to adolescents.
-
Implementation Steps and Techniques:
- The project consisted of three online sessions, covering the following phases:
- Focus Groups and Collaborative Storytelling: Understanding participants' device usage habits and their perceptions of technology disengagement.
- Collaborative Brainstorming and Idea Mapping: Generating solutions and grouping similar ideas.
- Designing Final Solutions: Individual sketching followed by team integration to produce comprehensive design solutions.
- The project consisted of three online sessions, covering the following phases:
Research Findings
-
Specific Outcomes:
- Participants proposed diverse design solutions, including time-tracking tools, encouragement of offline activities, educational initiatives, and mobile reminder technologies.
- Key design elements identified include balancing autonomy with parental involvement, emotional considerations, positive reinforcement, child-relevant design elements, and novelty.
-
Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
- Greater emphasis on user-centered mediation tools, encouraging children to participate in rule-making.
- Advocates for behavior change through gamification and reward systems rather than solely relying on restrictive measures.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Participants demonstrated high engagement during collaborative activities, generating 101 solutions through the co-design process.
- The identified design factors align with psychological research, showing that children value autonomy and personal goal-setting while also desiring parental support and care.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The sample size was small, and the applicability of the design concepts to broader social contexts or age groups remains unverified.
- Gender imbalance among participants may have influenced the co-design outcomes.
- Objective evaluation of the practical effectiveness of these solutions requires further research. Future studies could explore longer-term longitudinal research or co-design processes involving both early adolescents and their parents.
Conclusion
- This study expands the voice of early adolescents in technology use and design processes by co-designing technology-based mediation strategies with them.
- The results suggest that encouraging early adolescents' participation in design can enhance the acceptance and effectiveness of mediation tools, laying the groundwork for the development of new technology solutions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can early adolescents be engaged through co-design to develop technology-based regulation strategies that promote disconnection from technology?Category: Living Device Relationships and Sustainable UseSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do early adolescents perceive technology overuse, and what design elements should be included to promote technology disconnection?Category: Living Device Relationships and Sustainable UseSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which design elements can balance early adolescents' autonomy while incorporating parental support?Category: Living Device Relationships and Sustainable UseSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Early adolescents easily overuse electronic devices, and existing regulation tools are overly intrusive.Category: Living Device Relationships and Sustainable UseSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
A Badge, Not a Barrier: Designing for–and Throughout–Digital Badge Implementation
CHI '19· Special Education Technology +1
- 80%
Play-Based Design: Giving 3- to 4-Year-Old Children a Voice in the Design Process
CHI '20· Early Childhood Education Technology +2
- 80%
Social Wearables Edu-Larp: Insights From a Novel Camp Combining Crafting, Coding, and Larping Aimed at Non-traditional Steam Participants
CHI '25· STEM Education & Science Communication +2
- 80%
Growing With the Condition: Co-Designing Pediatric Technologies that Adapt Across Developmental Stages
CHI '26· Special Education Technology +1
- 67%
DesignABILITY: Framework for the Design of Accessible Interactive Tools to Support Teaching to Children with Disabilities
CHI '19· Universal & Inclusive Design +2
- 67%
Leaving the Field: Designing a Socio-Material Toolkit for Teachers to Continue to Design Technology with Children
CHI '21· Collaborative Learning & Peer Teaching +2
- 60%
Using Co-Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent Interfaces
CHI '18· Hand Gesture Recognition +1
- 60%
Making Diabetes Education Interactive: Tangible Educational Toys for Children with Type-1 Diabetes
CHI '19· Special Education Technology
- 60%
Exploring the Design Space for Parent-Child Reading
CHI '20· Early Childhood Education Technology +1
- 60%
Conversational Technologies for In-home Learning: Using Co-Design to Understand Children's and Parents' Perspectives
CHI '20· Conversational Chatbots +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)