Managing Deviant Behavior in Online Communities III
Authors
How do we determine what content and behavior in an online environment does not fit with community standards? What is "harassment" and how has the problem evolved over time? What automated and human-labor approaches are possible to manage inappropriate content? If platforms control what it is possible to say, what are the broader implications for the public sphere? In this panel discussion, we will highlight what we as a community have learned about these issues since this topic was presented as a panel at CHI twelve and twenty-four years ago
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Characterizing Twitter Users Who Engage in Adversarial Interactions against Political Candidates
CHI '20· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +1
- 80%
Systemization of Knowledge (SoK): Creating a Research Agenda for Human-Centered Real-Time Risk Detection on Social Media Platforms
CHI '24· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +2
- 75%
CivilServant: Community-Led Experiments in Platform Governance
CHI '18· Content Moderation & Platform Governance
- 67%
The End of “Trust and Safety”?: Examining the Future of Content Moderation and Upheavals in Professional Online Safety Efforts
CHI '25· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +2
- 67%
Silencing \& Surging: A Layered Ecology of Algorithmic Repression and Resistance in the Gaza Escalations
CHI '26· Content Moderation & Platform Governance +2
- 60%
Upstanding by Design: Bystander Intervention in Cyberbullying
CHI '18· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +1
- 60%
In Suspense About Suspensions? The Relative Effectiveness of Suspension Durations on a Popular Social Platform
CHI '25· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +1
- 60%
Gold Standard or Gold-Plated? Human Practices of Triple Verification in CSAM Takedown
CHI '26· Online Harassment & Counter-Tools +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)