ECGLens: Interactive Visual Exploration of Large Scale ECG Data for Arrhythmia Detection
Honorable MentionAuthors
The Electrocardiogram (ECG) is commonly used to detect arrhythmias. Traditionally, a single ECG observation is used for diagnosis, making it difficult to detect irregular arrhythmias. Recent technology developments, however, have made it cost-effective to collect large amounts of raw ECG data over time. This promises to improve diagnosis accuracy, but the large data volume presents new challenges for cardiologists. This paper introduces ECGLens, an interactive system for arrhythmia detection and analysis using large-scale ECG data. Our system integrates an automatic heartbeat classification algorithm based on convolutional neural network, an outlier detection algorithm, and a set of rich interaction techniques. We also introduce A-glyph, a novel glyph designed to improve the readability and comparison of ECG signals. We report results from a comprehensive user study showing that A-glyph improves the efficiency in arrhythmia detection, and demonstrate the effectiveness of ECGLens in arrhythmia detection through two expert interviews.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
VMS: Interactive Visualization to Support the Sensemaking and Selection of Predictive Models
IUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 60%
More Text Please! Understanding and Supporting the Use of Visualization for Clinical Text Overview
CHI '18· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
Modeling and Leveraging Analytic Focus During Exploratory Visual Analysis
CHI '21· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
"Alone and Adrift in Analytics" - Insights from Long-term Involvements with stroke Clinicians when Using Care Quality Monitoring Systems
CHI '26· Interactive Data Visualization +2
- 60%
Diagnosing Medical Score Calculator Apps
UbiComp '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
INVANER: INteractive VAscular Network Editing and Repair
UIST '19· Medical & Scientific Data Visualization +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)