A study of UX Practitioners Roles in Designing Real-World, Enterprise ML Systems
Document Title
A Study of UX Practitioners' Roles in Designing Real-World, Enterprise ML Systems
Document Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), User Experience Design (UX), Design and Development of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Systems
- Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), User-Centered Design (UCD), Design Thinking, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Design Methodology, Ethical Design, Complexity Management
Research Background and Issues
-
What problems or challenges did the authors identify?
- There is a lack of sufficient research on the design methodologies behind AI/ML system functionalities, particularly in real-world applications outside of large tech companies. Existing design methodologies such as User-Centered Design (UCD) have limitations when addressing the complexity of enterprise ML systems.
- Collaboration between design and technical teams, as well as how design is integrated into the internal mechanisms of system functionalities, remains unclear.
- Although attention to ethical issues (e.g., fairness, transparency, explainability) has increased, how these issues are addressed in actual design processes is still ambiguous.
-
Why is this issue important?
- With the widespread application of AI/ML systems across industries, their design must simultaneously address complex technical challenges and user interaction needs.
- Enterprises face high-risk application scenarios (e.g., medical diagnosis and fraud detection), where the consequences could be costly or even life-threatening.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work
- The authors aim to fill theoretical gaps in the academic field by studying the behavior of UX practitioners in interdisciplinary teams.
- Existing literature often focuses on technical aspects or is limited to interaction design for AI/ML, neglecting broader system design and team collaboration.
- Understanding AI/ML design cases in small and medium-sized enterprises can complement the limitations of case studies focused on "large tech companies" and provide more generalizable insights.
Solutions
-
What methods or solutions did the authors propose?
- Data collection through three research methods: online surveys (targeting product managers responsible for AI/ML projects), semi-structured group interviews with interdisciplinary teams, and in-depth interviews with individual UX designers.
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis of survey results to extract applicable design methodologies and collaboration models.
- Recommendations for improving HCI design methodologies based on practical needs, including the integration of high-fidelity prototyping and iterative processes.
-
What is innovative about this solution?
- The authors focus on small and medium-sized enterprises rather than resource-rich large tech companies, emphasizing the real challenges faced by smaller teams.
- By combining practical UX design processes with ethical considerations, they propose extending participatory design to the context of complex AI/ML systems.
- They investigate collaboration models within teams, particularly how designers' skills influence technical teams' functionality and algorithmic choices.
-
What are the implementation steps and key technologies used?
- A survey involving 27 product managers to explore design methodologies and ethical considerations.
- Group interviews and the use of UML (Unified Modeling Language) tools to map AI/ML design workflows.
- Qualitative coding methods to organize interview data into themes, identifying major challenges and successful cases.
Research Findings
-
What specific findings were achieved?
- Adaptation of Existing Design Methods:
- UX designers can adapt to the complexity of AI/ML, extending HCI techniques to areas such as data variable selection, sample data modeling, and post-deployment maintenance.
- A parallel workflow separating UX prototyping from AI/ML prototype development can prevent redundant work.
- Importance of Team Collaboration:
- The success of overall design relies on extensive interdisciplinary collaboration. Technical teams increasingly value design skills, and designers are involved in data understanding and selection processes.
- Deficiencies in Existing Design Approaches:
- Traditional HCI methods are overly focused on UI and UX, neglecting the contributions of design to system functionalities and algorithms.
- Prototype testing methods (e.g., Wizard of Oz) have limited utility in enterprise environments, particularly regarding the practicality of manually labeled data.
- Adaptation of Existing Design Methods:
-
What advantages does it have compared to existing solutions?
- It encourages designers to directly participate in decision-making at the system functionality level, rather than being confined to user interface design.
- It highlights the gap between theoretical design methodologies and everyday enterprise practices, while emphasizing the importance of post-deployment maintenance (e.g., preventing algorithmic drift).
-
What are the experimental or evaluation results?
- High-fidelity prototypes (using real data and polished designs) demonstrated superior performance in team communication and gaining user trust compared to low-fidelity prototypes.
- Through participatory design demonstrations, the authors illustrated how to effectively address complex issues such as transparency and fairness.
-
Limitations and Future Directions
- Limitations:
- The sample is concentrated in specific enterprise environments, which may not fully generalize to broader application scenarios.
- The data relies on subjective feedback from interviews, which needs to be cross-validated with actual user practices.
- Future Directions:
- Deepen research on collaboration models between UX practitioners and developers to build improved HCI methodologies.
- Develop specialized design tools and frameworks for designing complex, high-risk AI/ML systems.
- Standardize the integration of ethical design considerations and provide toolkit templates for sustainable AI design across enterprises of different scales.
- Limitations:
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do UX designers in small and medium enterprises address the complexity of enterprise ML systems and adapt existing design methods?Category: Human-AI Co-Creation and Collaborative InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can interdisciplinary teams efficiently collaborate to integrate design skills and technical requirements in AI/ML system feature design?Category: Human-AI Co-Creation and Collaborative InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What limitations exist in the applicability of existing HCI design methods for enterprise ML systems?Category: Human-AI Co-Creation and Collaborative InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Enterprise ML system design easily overlooks UX and ethical issues, affecting system practicality.Category: Human-AI Co-Creation and Collaborative InteractionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 71%
Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Design Principles for Generative AI Applications
CHI '24· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 71%
Understanding Socio-technical Factors Configuring AI Non-Use in UX Work Practices
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Be Friendly, Not Friends: How LLM Sycophancy Shapes User Trust
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Prototyping Multimodal GenAI Real-Time Agents with Counterfactual Replays and Hybrid Wizard-of-Oz
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 71%
Automating UI Optimization through Multi-Agentic Reasoning
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Interaction-Augmented Instruction: Modeling the Synergy of Prompts and Interactions in Human-GenAI Collaboration
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 71%
DuetUI: A Bidirectional Context Loop for Human-Agent Co-Generation of Task-Oriented Interfaces
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Prompt Coaching for Inclusiveness: A Media Literacy Approach to Increase Users’ Awareness of Algorithmic Bias and Prompting Efficacy
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 71%
Criticmate: Stagewise Human-AI Co-Critique in UI Design through Situation Awareness
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)