Designing for Knowledge Construction to Facilitate the Uptake of Open Science: Laying out the Design Space

User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)Research Ethics & Open ScienceUniversity Professors & ResearchersHCI Researchers

Title of the Paper

Designing for Knowledge Construction to Facilitate the Uptake of Open Science: Laying out the Design Space

Paper Information

  • Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Open Science, Knowledge Construction
  • Keywords: Open Science, Knowledge Construction, Design Implications, Platform Design, Learning Processes, Digital Environments, Collaborative Features, Visualization, HCI

Research Background and Problem

  • Problems and Challenges: The use of open science resources requires users (recipients of scientific content) to engage in knowledge construction. However, how to support this process through technological design has not been adequately studied. The core principles of open science are transparency, accessibility, and knowledge sharing. Despite its critical role in social and economic growth, the adoption of open science faces challenges related to knowledge integration and construction.
  • Research Significance: The success of open science practices is crucial for social and economic development. Specifically, it enables research outcomes to be understood and utilized by a broader audience through transparent and accessible collaborative networks.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work: Current HCI research on open science mainly focuses on general supportive technologies (e.g., sharing source code, technical support for reproducible research). However, there is a lack of systematic research on supporting knowledge construction, which is the innovative focus of this paper.

Solution

  • Proposed Solution:
    • The authors designed a method to construct a design space that supports knowledge construction by summarizing knowledge construction models from existing literature and mapping them to the core functionalities of open science platforms.
    • They employed design heuristics, i.e., empirically-based guiding principles, to assist in designing digital environments that support both individual and collaborative knowledge construction.
  • Innovative Aspects: This paper is the first to combine knowledge construction design with open science platforms, providing the HCI community with a systematic framework to support knowledge integration and construction in open science.
  • Research Implementation Steps:
    • Integrate the theoretical background of knowledge construction and extract design heuristics from the literature.
    • Categorize these heuristics into three design categories: supporting collaboration, supporting learning processes, and structuring learning content.
    • Map the design model to common open science platforms to form a foundational design space.
    • Propose 18 design implications to provide practical guidance for HCI designers.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Achievements:
    • Developed a comprehensive knowledge construction model that integrates major theories of individual and collaborative knowledge construction.
    • Extracted dozens of design heuristics from the literature and categorized them into three design categories.
    • Proposed 18 design implications, such as digital coaching, collaborative reflection, and providing knowledge visualization tools, along with preliminary practical recommendations.
  • Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
    • As one of the first platform design frameworks to specifically map knowledge construction techniques to the field of open science, this study provides systematic and directional guidance for the technological design of open science.
    • It considers the multidimensional complexity of knowledge construction in digital environments, including the interplay of cognitive, social, and technical functions.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:
    • The study validated the feasibility of the proposed modeling and its application to open science through a systematic literature review. However, the specific implementation and evaluation of the design implications have not yet been directly verified, highlighting the need for future research.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:
    • Limitations: Lack of direct evidence supporting knowledge construction in open science environments; empirical research on design implications requires further exploration.
    • Future Directions:
      • Test the proposed design implications in actual open science platforms.
      • Expand support to other open science practices (e.g., open data, open educational resources).
      • Explore differentiated design requirements for knowledge construction platforms in cross-cultural and international contexts.

This document clearly outlines the theoretical framework, practical guidance, and future research directions proposed by the authors to support knowledge construction in open science, offering a novel technical perspective and innovative contributions to the HCI and open science communities.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/71874/2022

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3491102.3517450
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2022
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation), Research Ethics & Open Science
work
Professions
University Professors & Researchers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers