“Protection on that Erection?”: Discourses of Accountability & Compromising Participation in Digital Sexual Health
Authors
This paper analyses sexual health workers’ ‘talk’ around their introduction of a digital platform to enhance a regionally managed condom distribution scheme for young people. In examining the discursive resources workers used in framing the sexual health service, their service users and digital technology, we argue that problematic ideologies around young people and sexuality were exercised and reproduced. Workers positioned themselves as the gatekeepers of young people’s sexual health, who were in turn constructed as ‘mischievous’ and ‘misguided’, with technology having a corruptive role over what was considered to be ‘healthy’ and ‘normal’ sexual relationships. We suggest our findings indicate severe challenges in developing community-commissioned platforms alongside service providers, and questions how plausible user participation can be in attempting to conduct collaborative, participatory and engaged work in this context.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Crafting, Communality, and Computing: Building on Existing Strengths To Support a Vulnerable Population
CHI '20· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 80%
Translation as (Re)mediation: How Ethnic Community-Based Organizations Negotiate Legitimacy
CHI '23· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 80%
Networks of care in digital domestic labour economies
CHI '24· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 80%
Safety With Community: Technologies of Care, Connection, Collective Safety, and Mutual Aid for Transgender Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (TBIPOC)
CHI '26· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +1
- 67%
Technologies for Social Justice: Lessons from Sex Workers on the Front Lines
CHI '19· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +2
- 60%
Computing and the Stigmatized: Trust, Surveillance, and Spatial Politics with the Sex Workers in Bangladesh
CHI '24· Empowerment of Marginalized Groups +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)