Metatation: Annotation as Implicit Interaction to Bridge Close and Distant Reading
Authors
In the domain of literary criticism, many critics practice close reading, annotating by hand while performing a detailed analysis of a single text. Often this process employs the use of external resources to aid analysis. In this article, we present a study and subsequent tool design focused on leveraging a critic’s annotations as implicit interactions for initiating context-specific computational support that automatically searches external resources. We observed 14 poetry critics performing a close reading, revealing a set of cognitive practices supported through free-form annotation that have not previously been discussed in this context. We used guidelines derived from our study to design a tool, Metatation, which uses a pen-and-paper system with a peripheral display to utilize reader annotations as underspecified interactions to augment close reading. By turning paper based annotations into implicit queries, Metatation provides relevant supplemental information in a just-in-time manner and acts as a bridge between close and distant reading.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Exploring the Role of Paradata in Digitally Supported Qualitative Co-Research
CHI '22· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +2
- 60%
How to Write CHI Papers -- Second Edition
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
How to Write CHI Papers -- Second Edition
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Content is King, Leadership Lags: Effects of Prior Experience on Newcomer Retention and Productivity in Online Production Groups
CHI '18· Community Collaboration & Wikipedia +1
- 60%
Empirical Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Crowdsourcing vs Laboratory-Style Social Acceptability Studies? Examining the Social Acceptability of Spatial User Interactions for Head-Worn Displays
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Kaleidoscope: A Reflective Documentation Tool for a User Interface Design Course
CHI '23· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Designing a Data-Driven Survey System: Leveraging Participants' Online Data to Personalize Surveys
CHI '24· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
Elicitating Challenges and User Needs Associated with Annotation Software for Plant Phenotyping
IUI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)