Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps

Citizen Science & Crowdsourced DataHuman-Nature Relationships (More-than-Human Design)Government Officials & Civil ServantsEnvironmental Advocates

Title of the Paper

Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps

Paper Information

  • Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction Design and Urban Ecological Conservation
  • Keywords: Camera, Care, Gardening, Human-Computer Interaction, Citizen Perception, Multispecies Relations, Urban Biodiversity

Research Background and Issues

  • Identified Problems and Challenges:

    • Urban expansion has increased the distance between humans and nature, limiting animal habitats.
    • Citizens have limited perception of animals in their everyday environment, and there is a lack of research on using sensing technologies to improve human-nature relationships.
    • There is insufficient research on designing sensing technologies to encourage long-term interaction with nature.
  • Significance:

    • Urban gardens and green spaces can serve as critical ecological networks supporting animal habitats, but their management relies on individual and community decisions.
    • Researching how technology and design can bridge human-nature relationships contributes to advancing urban ecological conservation.
  • Motivation and Related Work:

    • Related studies indicate that sensing technologies can reveal ecological interdependencies between humans and animals and enhance awareness of nature conservation.
    • Camera technology has been widely used in animal behavior studies, but understanding its use among ordinary citizens remains an initial exploration.
    • Using the framework of "multispecies relations," the study investigates technology design that prioritizes the needs of non-human ecologies.

Solution

  • Proposed Methods and Solutions:

    • Employ commercial reconnaissance cameras (e.g., hunting cameras or home security cameras) to allow participants to explore animal activities in their private gardens.
    • Introduce the theoretical framework of "multispecies relations," expanding from a human-centered perspective to focus on ecological interactions among animals, plants, and habitats.
  • Innovations:

    • Utilize technology for natural exploration in citizens' everyday environments, helping people build relationships with garden animals rather than merely exert control.
    • Explore how sharing media, storytelling, and family interactions can enhance care and connections with nature.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:

    • Participants use cameras to record videos or images in their gardens for a duration ranging from one week to several months.
    • Encourage participants to keep diaries and undergo follow-up interviews to document their perceptions, learning, and actions.
    • Employ qualitative analysis tools (NVivo 12) to code and summarize interview and diary texts.
    • Cameras provide video, audio, and images, inspiring participants to explore questions and relationships related to animals.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Findings:

    • Participants showed strong interest in local animals, particularly rare or aesthetically appealing ones.
    • Images of animal behaviors with "aesthetic appeal, humor, or mystery" were more likely to inspire further exploration by participants.
    • Video media were more effective in fostering relationship-building, such as observing animal behaviors or speculating about animal family dynamics.
  • Advantages:

    • Presented more complex "human-animal" relationships, encouraging prolonged observation of biological narratives in gardens.
    • Video files complemented the limitations of static images, enhancing the dimensions of perception.
    • Image sharing facilitated family interactions, promoting care and potentially spreading ecological awareness across generations.
  • Experimental Data and Evaluation Results:

    • Experiments demonstrated that the use of technology was linked to participants' ecological knowledge motivation, which was evident in their learning curve when adjusting camera settings and positions.
    • Long-term sensing practices encouraged exploration of dynamic garden processes, such as the impact of seasonal changes on animal behavior.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Technology was limited to sensing certain types of animals, failing to cover a broader range of species (e.g., insects or plants).
    • The study focused heavily on participants from European backgrounds, lacking research on indigenous perspectives or relationships of renters.
    • Suggested the development of more diverse sensing technologies, such as integrating bioacoustics, vibration sensing, or more abstract visual presentations.
    • Called for the co-development of technologies that directly improve urban wildlife habitats, emphasizing the construction of local natural cultures in urban areas.

This study highlights the dual objectives of "technology design": strengthening human-nature relationships while prioritizing the needs of non-human ecologies.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/47909/2021

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445438
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Citizen Science & Crowdsourced Data, Human-Nature Relationships (More-than-Human Design)
work
Professions
Government Officials & Civil Servants, Environmental Advocates
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers