User Trust in Assisted Decision-Making Using Miniaturized Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Authors
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationFitness Tracking & Physical Activity MonitoringBiosensors & Physiological MonitoringConsumers & ShoppersPersonal Finance Users
Title of the Paper
Research on User Trust in Decision Support Using Miniature Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Technology
Bibliographic Information
- Subject Area: User Trust and Human-Computer Interaction, Miniature Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Technology, Decision Support
- Keywords: NIRS, Food Detection, Decision Support, User Trust, Visualization Design, Time Analysis, User Experience
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- How to design and implement decision support systems in daily life to assist non-expert users (e.g., detecting allergens such as gluten in food).
- Current research primarily focuses on expert scenarios in medical or commercial fields, with limited studies on object recognition tasks in everyday decision-making.
- User interface design and the visualization of machine learning models play a critical but underexplored role in decision efficiency and user trust.
-
Significance of the Research:
- With the global increase in food allergies and health risks, accurately detecting food ingredients is crucial for ensuring consumer safety.
- Novel miniature near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology offers a user-friendly method for non-experts to detect food ingredients, with broad application potential.
-
Research Motivation:
- To explore how to enhance the usability, decision-making efficiency, and user trust in NIRS technology for non-expert users.
- To investigate potential user behavior biases (e.g., risk aversion) and the impact of decision time and user interface factors.
- To design decision support systems better suited for everyday scenarios.
Solution
-
Proposed Methods or Solutions:
- Designed and implemented an experimental protocol using a miniature NIRS scanner to detect whether food items (e.g., tortillas) contain gluten.
- Investigated the effects of different packaging label conditions (English, Russian, no label) and three types of information visualization (numerical, progress bar, grid).
- Developed a machine learning model to evaluate user decision accuracy, time consumption, and trust behavior based on experimental data.
-
Innovations:
- Conducted the first analysis of user trust and usage patterns of miniature NIRS technology in everyday decision-making tasks.
- Introduced new variables, such as label language and confidence visualization, to study their impact on non-expert users' cognition and trust.
- Provided practical recommendations for designing effective interactive interfaces for emerging technologies.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Experimental Design:
- 36 participants tested 18 tortilla samples under different packaging label and visualization conditions.
- Food samples were scanned using a miniature NIRS device, and the estimated results were displayed.
- Machine Learning Model Development:
- Gluten detection was performed using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine models, with the latter selected for its stability in analysis.
- User Behavior Analysis:
- User inspection time, scanning time, and trust decision behaviors were recorded, and qualitative interviews were conducted to assess factors influencing user trust.
- Experimental Design:
Research Findings
-
Specific Results Achieved:
- Users' decision accuracy with NIRS technology (0.858) was higher than their independent decision accuracy (0.767), particularly when label information was incomprehensible (0.634) or absent (0.667).
- Among the three visualization methods, participants preferred numerical and progress bar formats, while the grid format took longer and was the least favored.
- Users were more inclined to trust the NIRS device when label information was limited, especially when their independent decisions conflicted with the scanning results.
- Significant risk-averse behavior was observed, with users more likely to report "contains gluten" to avoid potential health risks.
-
Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
- Extended the application of emerging NIRS technology from industrial and scientific laboratory settings to everyday consumer scenarios.
- Provided detailed design guidelines for enhancing trust and user experience for non-expert users.
- Offered specific time optimization recommendations to improve interaction efficiency.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Different label and confidence visualization methods significantly influenced decision time and trust levels.
- Participants required approximately 75% confidence to trust the device's recommendations.
- In terms of user inspection time, incomprehensible information (Russian labels) disrupted decision efficiency.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- The experiment was limited to tortillas; future studies should expand to other food detection applications (e.g., peanuts, dairy products).
- The current experimental setting was in a laboratory environment; future research should validate results in real-world settings to enhance ecological validity.
- The study did not extensively explore the relationship between participants' individual characteristics (e.g., attitudes toward technology) and trust.
- Future research could explore additional dimensions of visualization design (e.g., color, hierarchy) to further improve user experience.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can decision support systems be designed so non-expert users can effectively use miniature near-infrared spectroscopy to detect food allergens (e.g., gluten)?Category: Medical AI Explanation, Trust, and RelianceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do packaging label language and information visualization affect users' decision efficiency and trust?Category: Medical AI Explanation, Trust, and RelianceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What are users' behavioral preferences and trust mechanisms when using miniature near-infrared spectroscopy in everyday decisions?Category: Medical AI Explanation, Trust, and RelianceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Ordinary consumers struggle to identify allergen ingredients in food and face potential risk.Category: Medical AI Explanation, Trust, and RelianceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445710
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
8 authors
sell
Subtopics
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation, Fitness Tracking & Physical Activity Monitoring, Biosensors & Physiological Monitoring
work
Professions
Consumers & Shoppers, Personal Finance Users
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers