Secrets of Gosu: Understanding Physical Combat Skills of Professional Players in First-Person Shooters
Honorable MentionAuthors
Title of the Paper
Secrets of Gosu: Understanding Physical Combat Skills of Professional Players in First-Person Shooters
Paper Information
- Domain: Research on physical combat skills of professional players in first-person shooter (FPS) games
- Keywords: First-person shooter games, esports, performance evaluation, dataset, user study
Research Background and Issues
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Professional FPS players exhibit significantly better performance than amateur players, but the specific skills or behaviors responsible for this difference remain unclear.
- Speculations about professional players' skills in online communities have not been scientifically validated.
- Current quantification of FPS player skills often relies on simplistic in-game metrics (e.g., kill/death ratio), failing to uncover hidden skill characteristics.
-
Significance:
- Understanding the skill mechanisms of professional FPS players is crucial for developing scientific training methods, player trading, and advancing esports as a serious academic discipline.
- Scientifically validating specific behaviors' effectiveness in gameplay can help improve amateur players' performance and guide efficient practice.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- This study was inspired by discussions in online communities, selecting common skill hypotheses for investigation.
- An innovative game behavior recording system was developed to collect comprehensive data from professional and amateur players, quantitatively validating these hypotheses.
Solution
-
Research Methods:
- Hypothesis Construction:
- Extracted hypotheses from communities, high-view YouTube videos, and professional blogs, selecting 13 hypotheses applicable to general FPS games.
- Data Collection:
- Designed a comprehensive game recording system incorporating six behavioral sensors (motion capture, eye tracking, mouse, keyboard, electromyography, and electrical pulse sensors) along with in-game data recording.
- Participant Recruitment:
- Recruited 8 professional and 8 amateur players, collecting data through 30-minute matches in a one-on-one mode of CS:GO.
- Quantitative Performance Metrics:
- Proposed 15 quantitative metrics covering four categories: aiming, character movement, physical skills, and device usage/settings.
- Hypothesis Construction:
-
Innovations:
- Introduced data-driven quantitative performance metrics, overcoming the limitations of relying solely on in-game statistical indicators.
- Developed a multimodal sensor system ensuring high-precision synchronization of multi-source data.
- Systematically validated community-derived game skill hypotheses and made the data publicly available for future research.
-
Implementation Steps:
- Built the data collection system and verified its validity and accuracy.
- Designed experiments and recorded player data, capturing in-game behaviors and event information via dynamic link libraries (DLL).
- Preprocessed and analyzed data, validating each hypothesis and conducting statistical significance tests.
Research Findings
-
Specific Results:
- Out of the 13 hypotheses, 6 were statistically significantly supported:
- Professional players excel at controlling weapon recoil during aiming (Hypothesis A-3).
- Professional players adapt better to mouse sensitivity settings (Hypothesis A-4).
- Professional players integrate crouching movements more frequently during character movement (Hypothesis M-2).
- Professional players use their arms more for aiming (Hypothesis P-1).
- Professional players utilize larger mouse pad areas (Hypothesis D-1).
- Professional players position keyboards at steeper angles (Hypothesis D-2).
- Other hypotheses, such as "enemy aim stickiness (A-1)" and "gaze duration for environmental detection (P-3)," were partially supported or contradicted expectations.
- Out of the 13 hypotheses, 6 were statistically significantly supported:
-
Comparison with Existing Solutions:
- Surpassed traditional FPS skill analysis methods based on simple statistics (e.g., kill/death ratio).
- Emphasized behavioral process data collection, providing higher credibility for studying FPS game skill characteristics.
-
Experimental and Evaluation Results:
- Professional players significantly outperformed amateur players in metrics such as "shooting reaction time" and "mouse operation efficiency."
- Professional players using low mouse sensitivity settings performed better and relied more on larger mouse pad areas.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Professional players' lack of experience with the experimental game (CS:GO) might affect performance data.
- Experimental settings differ from real competitions, such as reduced psychological pressure due to small map configurations.
- Lack of research on team skills in multiplayer environments.
- Future Directions:
- Validate the proposed performance metrics across various FPS games.
- Investigate the impact of devices and game interfaces on players' combat strategies.
- Use cognitive experiments to separate the effects of "innate ability" and "acquired training."
- Limitations:
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- What specific differences in physical skills distinguish professional from amateur FPS players?Category: Gameplay, Player Behavior, and Engagement ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which skills extracted from community assumptions are associated with superior performance among professional FPS players?Category: Gameplay, Player Behavior, and Engagement ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can a multimodal data collection system objectively evaluate FPS players' skill levels?Category: Gameplay, Player Behavior, and Engagement ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Casual players do not know how to imitate professional FPS players' skills to improve their own performance.Category: Gameplay, Player Behavior, and Engagement ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
The RAD: Making Racing Games Equivalently Accessible to People Who Are Blind
CHI '18· Accessible Gaming +1
- 75%
Understanding Tilt in Esports: A Study of Young League of Legends Players
CHI '21· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Healthy Lies: The Effects of Misrepresenting Player Health Data on Experience, Behavior, and Performance
CHI '19· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Improving Viewing Experiences of First-Person Shooter Gameplays with Automatically-Generated Motion Effects
CHI '21· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +2
- 60%
What Players Want: Information Needs of Players on Post-GameVisualizations
CHI '21· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
Lower is Better? The Effects of Local Latencies on Competitive First-Person Shooter Game Players
CHI '21· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
Do People Use Games to Compensate for Psychological Needs During Crises? A Mixed-Methods Study of Gaming During COVID-19 Lockdowns
CHI '22· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
- 60%
“My Zelda Cane”: Strategies Used by Blind Players to Play Visual-Centric Digital Games
CHI '23· Deaf & Hard-of-Hearing Support (Captions, Sign Language, Vibration) +2
- 60%
The Trick is to Stay Behind?: Defining and Exploring the Design Space of Player Balancing Mechanics
CHI '24· Game UX & Player Behavior +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)