ExplAIn Yourself! Transparency for Positive UX in Autonomous Driving
Authors
Automated Driving Interface & Takeover DesignExplainable AI (XAI)AI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationAutonomous Driving Engineers & Test DriversUI/UX Designers
Document Title
ExplAIn Yourself! Transparency for Positive UX in Autonomous Driving
Document Information
- Subject Area: Autonomous driving user experience design, explainable artificial intelligence
- Keywords: User experience, explainable artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, controllability, user acceptance, transparency, human-computer interaction, driving simulation, user study, design guidelines
Research Background and Problem
- Challenges identified by the authors:
- In autonomous vehicles, the AI system replaces human driving behavior, which may lead to user distrust of the system and result in negative user experience (UX).
- Passive driving experiences (e.g., passengers feeling confused or dissatisfied with the vehicle's decisions or driving style) can reduce user acceptance and sense of control.
- Importance:
- In the early stages of autonomous driving technology adoption, user acceptance is a critical factor in determining the success of the technology.
- Enhancing users' perceived safety and transparency can effectively reduce anxiety and promote the application of autonomous driving technology.
- Research Motivation:
- To explore how explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) can be integrated with user experience design (UXD) to improve transparency in autonomous driving systems and enhance user trust and acceptance.
Solution
- Proposed Approach:
- The authors designed an experimental study using a driving simulator and a mobile application to investigate the impact of system transparency on user experience.
- Comparison of two information delivery modes: live explanations during the driving process and retrospective explanations provided via a mobile app after the drive.
- Innovative Aspects:
- Combining XAI methods with UXD research, focusing on the impact of information transparency on the user experience of first-time autonomous vehicle users.
- Offering a preliminary set of design guidelines for autonomous driving user experience.
- Implementation Steps:
- Simulate fully autonomous driving scenarios (SAE Level 5) using a fixed driving simulator and a mobile application.
- Divide participants into two groups: one receiving live explanation information during the ride, and the other accessing explanations retrospectively via the app after the ride.
- Evaluate participants' user experience and perceived safety under different test conditions.
- Key Technologies:
- AR (augmented reality)-based visualization of information in dynamic driving scenarios.
- Standard questionnaires (AVAM and UEQ-S) to measure user acceptance, sense of control, and user experience.
Research Outcomes
- Main Findings:
- Providing explanatory information (whether live or retrospective) helps transform negative user experiences into neutral ones.
- Live explanations are more effective in improving users' understanding and acceptance of autonomous driving systems.
- A higher sense of control is significantly correlated with more positive user experiences.
- Experimental Results:
- The group receiving live explanations demonstrated significantly better user experience and understanding of system behavior compared to the group without live explanations.
- In the absence of live explanations, retrospective feedback via the mobile app significantly improved users' perceived sense of control and understanding.
- However, the combined effect of live explanations and retrospective feedback was not significant.
- Limitations:
- The use of a static driving simulator may have affected participants' realistic perception, particularly in safety evaluations.
- Participants were predominantly young (average age 24.65), which may have skewed results toward higher technology acceptance.
- The study focused solely on short-term experiences of first-time users, leaving long-term usage effects unexplored.
- Future Directions:
- Investigate personalized information presentation to accommodate different user preferences and changes in transparency during long-term interactions.
- Conduct real-time experiments in dynamic driving scenarios to further validate the impact of information transparency on user trust and experience.
- Integrate multimodal interactions (e.g., audio, seat vibrations) to enhance the effectiveness of sensory information delivery.
Summary and Contributions
- Preliminary Design Guidelines:
- Live explanations effectively alleviate users' negative emotions toward autonomous driving and improve their experience.
- Retrospective feedback can also enhance user experience in the absence of live explanations, but live explanations are more effective in providing overall psychological safety.
- Enhancing the sense of control is a key principle for designing user-friendly autonomous driving systems.
- Contributions to the Research Community:
- The study is the first to integrate UX and XAI fields, offering practical insights and guidelines for designing more positive user experiences.
- Provides a reference direction for future research on autonomous driving and human-computer interaction.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can autonomous driving systems improve UX and acceptance through information transparency?Category: Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving and Human-Machine Co-DrivingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which is more effective at enhancing user trust and understanding of autonomous driving systems: real-time explanation or post-hoc review explanation?Category: Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving and Human-Machine Co-DrivingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What role does information transparency play in enhancing users' sense of control over autonomous driving systems?Category: Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving and Human-Machine Co-DrivingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Passengers distrust autonomous driving system decisions, leading to poor experience.Category: Trust Calibration in Autonomous Driving and Human-Machine Co-DrivingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 67%
Effects of Automation Transparency on Trust: Evaluating HMI in the Context of Fully Autonomous Driving
AutoUI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
TimelyTale: A Multimodal Dataset Approach to Assessing Passengers' Explanation Demands in Highly Automated Vehicles
UbiComp '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Effects of Uncertain Trajectory Prediction Visualization in Highly Automated Vehicles on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load
UbiComp '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
P9 - Designing a Guardian Angel: Giving an Automated Vehicle the Possibility to Override its Driver
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3446647
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design, Explainable AI (XAI), AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation
work
Professions
Autonomous Driving Engineers & Test Drivers, UI/UX Designers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers