Effects of Automation Transparency on Trust: Evaluating HMI in the Context of Fully Autonomous Driving
Authors
Automation transparency offers a promising way for users to calibrate their trust in autonomous vehicles. However, it is still unknown what kind of information should be provided in driving scenarios with different risks and how this affects user trust. Driving scenarios based on different risks and Human-Machine-Interface (HMI) with different transparency based on Situation Awareness–Based Agent Transparency (SAT) model were developed to investigate the impact of risk and transparency on user trust using nine simulated fully autonomous drives within a static driving simulator environment. Results showed that driving scenario with lower-risk and HMI with higher-transparency increased user trust-related beliefs and intention to use. And perceived reliability and trust fully mediated the effects of risk and transparency on intention to use. The findings of this study provide insights on HMI transparency under different driving scenarios that may impact user trust.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Efficient Visual Appearance Optimization by Learning from Prior Preferences
UIST '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
CHI '20· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
ExplAIn Yourself! Transparency for Positive UX in Autonomous Driving
CHI '21· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 67%
How can Explainability Methods be Used to Support Bug Identification in Computer Vision Models?
CHI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
Zeno: An Interactive Framework for Behavioral Evaluation of Machine Learning
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 67%
MIWA: Mixed-Initiative Web Automation for Better User Control and Confidence
UIST '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)