The Performative Mirror Space
Authors
Interactive mirrors, typically combining semi-transparent mirrors, digital screens and interaction mechanisms have been developed for a variety of application areas. Drawing on existing techniques to create interactive mirror spaces, we investigated their performative qualities through artistic discovery and collaborative prototyping. We document a linked set of design explorations and two public, site-specific experiences that brought together artists, communities, and HCI researchers. We illustrate the abstracted interactive mirror space that practitioners in the performance art, theatre and museum sectors can work with. In turn, we also discuss six performative design strategies concerning the use of physical context, movement and narrative that HCI researchers who wish to deploy interactive mirrors in more mainstream settings need to consider.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
A Plurality of Practices: Artistic Narratives in HCI Research
C&C '21· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance +1
- 67%
“Turning the Invisible Visible”: Transdisciplinary Bioart Explorations in Human-DNA Interaction
CHI '21· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance +1
- 67%
Curating Interactive Art for Online Conferences: Artist, Curator and Technologist Experiences in Gather.Town
C&C '22· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance +1
- 60%
Engaging with Public Art: An Exploration of the Design Space
CHI '20· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance
- 60%
The Normal Natural Troubles of Virtual Reality in Mixed-Reality Performances
CHI '22· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance +1
- 60%
Play Design as a Relational Strategy to Intensify Affective Encounters in the Art Museum
DIS '20· Interactive Narrative & Immersive Storytelling
- 60%
Expanding the Design Space for Technology-Mediated Theatre Experiences
DIS '21· Digital Art Installations & Interactive Performance +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)