Personas and Analytics: A Comparative User Study of Efficiency and Effectiveness for a User Identification Task

Honorable Mention
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation)Prototyping & User TestingUniversity Professors & ResearchersUI/UX DesignersHCI Researchers

Personas are a well-known technique in human computer interaction. However, there is a lack of rigorous empirical research evaluating personas relative to other methods. In this 34-participant experiment, we compare a persona system and an analytics system, both using identical user data, for efficiency and effectiveness for a user identification task. Results show that personas afford faster task completion than the analytics system, as well as outperforming analytics with significantly higher user identification accuracy. Qualitative analysis of think-aloud transcripts shows that personas have other benefits regarding learnability and consistency. However, the analytics system affords insights and capabilities that personas cannot due to inherent design differences. Findings support the use of personas to learn about users, empirically confirming some of the stated benefits in the literature, while also highlighting the limitations of personas that may necessitate the use of accompanying methods.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/31946/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376770
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation), Prototyping & User Testing
work
Professions
University Professors & Researchers, UI/UX Designers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers