Social Boundaries for Personal Agents in the Interpersonal Space of the Home

AI Ethics, Fairness & AccountabilityHome Voice Assistant ExperienceSmart Home Privacy & SecurityPrivacy Policy MakersHCI Researchers

The presence of voice activated personal assistants (VAPAs) in people's homes rises each year [31]. Industry efforts are invested in making interactions with VAPAs more personal by leveraging information from messages and calendars, and by accessing user accounts for 3rd party services. However, the use of personal data becomes more complicated in interpersonal spaces, such as people's homes. Should a shared agent access the information of many users? If it does, how should it navigate issues of privacy and control? Designers currently lack guidelines to help them design appropriate agent behaviors. We used Speed Dating to explore inchoate social mores around agent actions within a home, including issues of proactivity, interpersonal conflict, and agent prevarication. Findings offer new insights on how more socially sophisticated agents might sense, make judgements about, and navigate social roles and individuals. We discuss how our findings might impact future research and future agent behaviors.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/31919/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376311
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability, Home Voice Assistant Experience, Smart Home Privacy & Security
work
Professions
Privacy Policy Makers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
2 related papers