HiSync: Spatio-Temporally Aligning Hand Motion from Wearable IMU and On-Robot Camera for Command Source Identification in Long-Range HRI
Authors
Paper Title
HiSync: Spatio-Temporally Aligning Hand Motion from Wearable IMU and On-Robot Camera for Command Source Identification in Long-Range HRI
Publication Info
- Topic area: Long-range human-robot interaction (HRI) focusing on command source identification (CSI).
- Keywords: Human-robot interaction, command source identification, optical-inertial fusion, wearable IMU, robot-mounted camera, long-range interaction, gesture recognition, multi-user scenarios, public-space robotics, spectral motion analysis.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Long-range HRI scenarios introduce challenges such as visual ambiguity, unnatural interaction methods, and sensor noise, making CSI difficult in multi-user environments.
- Significance: Reliable CSI is essential for enabling intuitive and robust interactions in public spaces, such as summoning service robots or directing drones from a distance.
- Motivation and related work: Prior work largely focuses on near-range HRI or requires unnatural gestures, expensive hardware, or pre-deployed infrastructure. Existing visual-inertial fusion methods degrade at long distances due to synchronization issues and noise. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a robust CSI system for long-range, multi-user HRI.
Solution
- Proposed approach: HiSync, an optical-inertial fusion framework that aligns robot-mounted camera optical flow with hand-worn IMU signals to identify command sources in long-range HRI.
- Novelty:
- Introduction of a spectral-domain optical-inertial fusion framework for CSI.
- Development of CSINet with modules like Quality-Aware Feature Modulation, IMU-Anchored Cross-Modal Attention, and Scale-Aware Multi-Window Fusion.
- Creation of the first large-scale multimodal dataset for long-range CSI.
- Validation of HiSync on real-robot deployments in dynamic environments.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Extract spectral motion features from robot-mounted cameras and wearable IMUs.
- Use CSINet to align and match cross-modal features, leveraging quality-aware modulation, multi-window fusion, and attention mechanisms.
- Evaluate the system on curated datasets and real-world scenarios, including adversarial settings with mimics and bystanders.
Results
- Concrete findings: HiSync achieves 97.82% accuracy from 3–34 m, outperforming the previous SOTA by 27.3%. At 34 m, HiSync maintains 94.31% accuracy compared to the baseline's 43.88%.
- Advantage over baselines: HiSync outperforms vision-only and optical-inertial baselines, especially at long distances, with up to 26.30% higher accuracy than VIPL and robust performance under temporal noise.
- Experiments / evaluation: Evaluated on a multimodal dataset (9465 sequences, 452,055 frames) and real-robot deployments. Metrics include CSI accuracy, response time, and subjective usability scores. Ablation studies confirm the importance of spectral features and multi-window fusion.
- Limitations and future work: Limited ecological validity due to low crowd density in test environments; sensitivity to robot ego-motion; untested multi-IMU scenarios. Future work involves extending to dynamic robot motion, natural micro-gestures, and high-density venues.
Summary
HiSync introduces a novel optical-inertial fusion framework for robust command source identification in long-range human-robot interaction. By aligning wearable IMU signals with robot-mounted camera optical flow in the spectral domain, HiSync achieves high accuracy (up to 94.31% at 34 m) and outperforms existing methods. The system is validated on a large multimodal dataset and real-robot deployments, demonstrating usability and scalability in dynamic environments. Future work aims to address limitations such as crowd density and robot motion, expanding applicability to public spaces and multi-user scenarios.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)