TraceRing: Touchpad-like Pointing with a Single IMU Ring through Personalized Learning

Haptic WearablesHand Gesture RecognitionMobile Augmented RealityUI/UX DesignersAI/ML Researchers & Engineers

Paper Title

TraceRing: Touchpad-like Pointing with a Single IMU Ring through Personalized Learning

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Wearable technology for human-computer interaction
  • Keywords: IMU, touchpad, wearable interaction, personalized learning, cursor control, machine learning, AR/VR, gesture input, Fitts’ Law, usability evaluation

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Achieving precise 2D pointing with a single IMU ring is challenging due to incomplete motion data and significant user variability. Prior single-IMU solutions often underperform compared to multi-sensor or multi-ring setups.
  • Significance: A portable, accurate, and ubiquitous pointing solution could enhance interaction with AR/VR devices, large displays, and mobile computing platforms, addressing limitations of current input methods.
  • Motivation and related work: Previous approaches using IMU-based rings or other wearable devices often rely on additional sensors or calibration, compromising portability. Single-IMU systems lack accuracy due to physiological variability and motion mapping challenges. This paper builds on these findings and proposes a personalized learning framework to overcome these limitations.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: TraceRing, a single-IMU ring system that employs a personalized learning framework to enable touchpad-like pointing.
  • Novelty:
    1. Introduction of a multi-task personalization framework combining supervised and contrastive learning for user-specific adaptation without calibration.
    2. Development of a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture to dynamically select suitable models based on user embeddings.
    3. Demonstration of real-time usability and performance gains over state-of-the-art IMU-based systems.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Data preprocessing: Gravity compensation to eliminate irrelevant accelerometer readings.
    • Task Encoder: TCN-LSTM architecture for capturing task-related temporal patterns.
    • User Encoder: BiLSTM with temporal attention for extracting user-specific features.
    • MoE Module: Multiple MLP experts dynamically weighted by user embeddings for velocity prediction.
    • Training: Multi-component loss combining velocity prediction, contrastive learning, and prototype-based clustering.
    • Real-time inference: Event-driven touch detection, CD gain application, and efficient user embedding updates.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Velocity prediction error reduced by 33.9% compared to MouseRing (1.48 cm²/s² vs. 2.24 cm²/s²).
    • Real-time task completion time improved significantly over AirMouse (2.26s vs. 3.01s).
    • User embedding effectively distinguishes unseen users and generalizes well.
  • Advantage over baselines: TraceRing outperformed MouseRing and AirMouse in velocity prediction and task completion efficiency, while maintaining portability and usability.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Dataset: 50 participants, multimodal data collection including IMU, motion capture, and pressure pad.
    • Fitts’ Law usability test: Compared TraceRing to touchpad, mouse, and AirMouse across varying task difficulties.
    • Surface tests: Evaluated performance on different materials (wood, acrylic, rubber, plastic, thigh).
    • Subjective feedback: High user acceptance (87.5% willing to adopt TraceRing) and envisioned diverse application scenarios.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Precision issues for fine-grained control and small targets.
    • Latency due to BLE communication and system delays.
    • Limited dataset coverage for soft or non-flat surfaces.
    • Future improvements include adaptive DPI adjustment, enhanced click detection, and expanded dataset for cross-surface generalization.

Summary

TraceRing introduces a single-IMU ring system that achieves touchpad-like pointing through personalized learning, addressing limitations of prior single-IMU approaches. It reduces velocity prediction error by 33.9% and significantly improves task completion times compared to AirMouse. Usability studies confirm its portability, ease of learning, and high user acceptance, with applications spanning AR/VR, large displays, and mobile computing. While challenges remain in precision and latency, TraceRing demonstrates the feasibility of lightweight, personalized wearable interaction and sets the stage for future advancements in sensor-based machine learning.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223277/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790463
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
8 authors
sell
Subtopics
Haptic Wearables, Hand Gesture Recognition, Mobile Augmented Reality
work
Professions
UI/UX Designers, AI/ML Researchers & Engineers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers