UEQManager: A Non-intrusive and Real-time System for Recognizing and Managing UEQ in Multilingual Voice Assistants
Authors
Paper Title
UEQManager: A Non-intrusive and Real-time System for Recognizing and Managing UEQ in Multilingual Voice Assistants
Publication Info
- Topic area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and adaptive voice assistant systems.
- Keywords: UEQ, multilingual voice assistants, gaze tracking, deep learning, adaptive interfaces, real-time systems, user experience, non-intrusive sensing, SHAP analysis, proactive adaptation.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Current methods for assessing User Experience Quality (UEQ) in voice assistants rely heavily on post-hoc questionnaires, which are retrospective, intrusive, and fail to capture real-time fluctuations in user experience.
- Significance: Real-time UEQ recognition and management are critical for improving user satisfaction, engagement, and trust in multilingual voice assistants, especially in diverse linguistic contexts.
- Motivation and related work: Prior research has explored UEQ dimensions and multilingual capabilities but lacks dynamic, non-intrusive systems for real-time UEQ assessment and adaptive interaction. Behavioral signals like gaze have shown promise for inferring user states, but their integration into practical systems remains underexplored.
Solution
- Proposed approach: UEQManager—a real-time, non-intrusive system that uses webcam-based gaze tracking to predict UEQ dimensions and adapt voice assistant behavior proactively.
- Novelty:
- Development of interpretable deep learning models to predict UEQ and its seven subdimensions using gaze features.
- Integration of gaze-based UEQ predictions into adaptive interaction strategies using large language models (LLMs).
- Implementation of a real-time, privacy-preserving system for continuous UEQ monitoring and management.
- Empirical validation through user testing, demonstrating significant improvements in UEQ metrics compared to baselines.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Module 1: Gaze-based UEQ prediction using deep learning architectures (BiLSTM-A, Hybrid-P, Hybrid-A) trained on eye-tracking data.
- Module 2: Adaptive interface design using LLMs to generate context-specific micro-interventions based on predicted UEQ deficits.
- Module 3: System integration with real-time webcam-based gaze sensing and privacy-preserving processing.
- User testing with 18 participants to evaluate system effectiveness.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- UEQManager improved overall UEQ by 27.29% compared to baseline systems.
- Significant improvements were observed across all UEQ subdimensions, with Trustworthiness of Content showing the highest improvement (+7.22 points).
- Predictive models achieved moderate R² values (e.g., 0.19–0.35 for UEQKPI) and consistently outperformed linear, CNN, and Transformer baselines.
- Real-time system latency was measured at 39.2 ± 3.1 ms, meeting interactive thresholds (<50 ms).
- Advantage over baselines:
- UEQManager consistently outperformed both non-adaptive and random-strategy baselines in user experience metrics and behavioral speech features (e.g., speech rate, jitter).
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Within-subjects user testing (N=18) with three simulated VAs (baseline, random strategy, UEQManager).
- Metrics included standardized UEQ+ questionnaires and behavioral speech features (e.g., speech rate, jitter).
- Statistical analyses (paired t-tests, ANOVA) confirmed significant improvements in UEQ metrics and speech fluency under UEQManager conditions.
- Limitations and future work:
- Prediction accuracy remains moderate; future work could enhance model robustness with larger datasets.
- Correlational evidence from interpretability analysis does not directly validate cognitive mechanisms.
- System robustness under varied operational conditions (e.g., lighting, background noise) was not tested.
- Ethical and privacy concerns around camera-based sensing require further safeguards and participatory design.
Summary
UEQManager is a proof-of-concept system that integrates webcam-based gaze sensing, interpretable deep learning models, and adaptive interaction strategies to recognize and manage UEQ in multilingual voice assistants. The system demonstrated significant improvements in user experience metrics, outperforming baseline approaches in both subjective and behavioral evaluations. By leveraging gaze cues for real-time UEQ prediction and proactive adaptation, UEQManager offers a practical pathway for enhancing user satisfaction, trust, and engagement in voice assistant interactions. Future work should address prediction accuracy, operational robustness, and ethical considerations to support broader deployment.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 86%
ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principles
IUI '24· Intelligent Voice Assistants (Alexa, Siri, etc.) +2
- 71%
From Text to Self: Users’ Perception of AIMC Tools on Interpersonal Communication and Self
CHI '24· Multilingual & Cross-Cultural Voice Interaction +2
- 63%
Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges
CHI '23· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and Overreliance
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Personal Validation Effect in LLMs: Positive AI Responses Bias Perceptions of Validity, Reliability, Personalization, and Usefulness of Fictitious Predictions
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Sensemaking in Multi-Agent LLM Interfaces: How Users Interpret Transparency and Trustworthiness Cues
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Presenting Large Language Models as Companions Affects What Mental Capacities People Attribute to Them
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
From Use to Oversight: How Mental Models Influence User Behavior and Output in AI Writing Assistants
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 63%
Is Conversational XAI All You Need? Human-AI Decision Making With a Conversational XAI Assistant
IUI '25· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 63%
How Users Perceive Mixed-Initiative AI: Attitudes Toward Assistance in Problem Solving
IUI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)