Revisiting Worker-Centered Design: Tensions, Blind Spots, and Action Spaces

Participatory DesignPrototyping & User TestingImpact of Automation on WorkFood Delivery Riders & Ride-Hailing DriversSoftware Engineers & DevelopersUI/UX Designers

Paper Title

Revisiting Worker-Centered Design: Tensions, Blind Spots, and Action Spaces

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Worker-Centered Design (WCD) in HCI and design, focusing on labor systems and systemic challenges.
  • Keywords: Worker-Centered Design, labor systems, platform economy, food delivery, design critique, participatory design, service design, labor conflict, policy, economic imagination.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Current Worker-Centered Design (WCD) approaches often replicate shortcomings of traditional design methods, such as overlooking systemic labor conflicts, failing to scale beyond research contexts, and being distorted by political-economic forces.
  • Significance: Addressing these issues is critical to ensuring that WCD interventions genuinely support worker welfare, particularly in sectors like food delivery, where algorithmic management and labor precarity are prevalent.
  • Motivation and related work: Previous research in HCI and design has explored worker needs and participatory methods but has often focused on isolated groups, neglected systemic labor dynamics, and struggled to achieve real-world impact. This paper builds on these critiques to propose new frameworks for WCD.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: Introduction of a Multi-Laborer System perspective and a Diagnostic–Generative Pathway to address systemic tensions and guide actionable WCD interventions.
  • Novelty:
    1. Conceptualization of the food delivery industry as a Multi-Laborer System, highlighting interdependencies and conflicts across labor roles.
    2. Development of the Diagnostic–Generative Pathway, a framework for navigating labor conflicts, institutional reframing, and political-economic dynamics in WCD.
    3. Emphasis on integrating policy and economic imagination into design education and practice.
    4. Reflexive critique of WCD’s limitations and actionable guidance for researchers, practitioners, and educators.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Four-lens analytical framework: foundation (design-labor relations), frontstage (workers’ lived experiences), backstage (platform design processes), and offstage (political-economic contexts).
    • Reflexive analysis of the food delivery industry, incorporating empirical data, literature, and public media.
    • Application of the Multi-Laborer System and Diagnostic–Generative Pathway to identify blind spots and propose actionable design strategies.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • WCD often overlooks systemic labor conflicts, such as tensions between couriers, restaurant staff, and consumers.
    • Worker-centered interventions are frequently distorted by institutional interests, leading to unintended consequences like reduced autonomy or increased competition.
    • Designers lack familiarity with political-economic dynamics, limiting their ability to leverage policy or market shifts for worker welfare.
    • Workers actively reshape their environments through everyday practices, highlighting the need for WCD to align with community-led solutions.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • The Multi-Laborer System provides a holistic view of labor dynamics, addressing gaps in traditional WCD approaches that focus on isolated worker groups.
    • The Diagnostic–Generative Pathway offers actionable guidance for navigating systemic tensions, unlike prior frameworks that remain conceptual or limited to specific contexts.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Four-year engagement with the food delivery industry, including field studies in Europe and China.
    • Analysis of platform practices, worker experiences, and regulatory impacts using the four-lens framework.
    • Prototyping and testing of worker-centered tools, such as a crowdsourced platform for couriers.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Uncertainty about whether designers have the time or authority to apply the proposed frameworks in practice.
    • Need for further research to understand adoption barriers and refine the Pathway.
    • Encouragement for future studies to explore broader applications of the Multi-Laborer System and Pathway across industries and design disciplines.

Summary

This paper critically revisits Worker-Centered Design (WCD) by introducing the Multi-Laborer System and Diagnostic–Generative Pathway to address systemic tensions and blind spots in current approaches. Through a four-lens analysis of the food delivery industry, the authors reveal conflicts across labor chains, distortions in WCD implementations, and designers’ limited engagement with political-economic dynamics. The proposed frameworks provide actionable guidance for researchers, practitioners, and educators to navigate these challenges and create more just and inclusive design outcomes. This work bridges the gap between WCD research and real-world impact, offering new directions for advancing worker welfare in complex labor systems.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/221912/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791128
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Participatory Design, Prototyping & User Testing, Impact of Automation on Work
work
Professions
Food Delivery Riders & Ride-Hailing Drivers, Software Engineers & Developers, UI/UX Designers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers