Exploring the Nexus of Technology and Food Practices in Young Adults: A Value-Sensitive Design Perspective towards Human-Food Interaction

Participatory DesignFood Culture & Food Interaction

Research Background and Issues

  • What problems or challenges did the authors identify?

    • Contemporary young people face tensions between technology and tradition, which impact their eating habits and the preservation of cultural heritage.
    • Existing research predominantly prioritizes technological efficiency, neglecting the value conflicts and emotional dimensions of food culture, such as the loss of traditional recipes, the decline of home cooking practices, and the impact of globalization on local cuisines.
    • The contradiction between technological convenience and cultural preservation is particularly pronounced. There is also a need to explore how technology can enhance intergenerational knowledge transfer and cultural practices.
  • Why is this issue important?

    • Food is not only a basic necessity but also a vital carrier of cultural heritage, closely tied to family relationships, social connections, and ecological sustainability.
    • Against the backdrop of globalization and rapid technological development, the preservation and continuation of traditional culture face severe challenges. However, technology also offers opportunities for innovative food experiences and cultural dissemination.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work

    • This study is based on the Value-Sensitive Design (VSD) framework, aiming to analyze the conflicts and opportunities in Human-Food Interaction (HFI) from a value perspective.
    • Existing research on HFI emphasizes how technology influences tradition, innovation, and food experiences but rarely addresses value integration perspectives. Through the VSD framework, this study creates a perspective to explore young people's eating habits and the integration of culture and technology.

Solutions

  • What methods or solutions did the authors propose?

    • Combining the VSD framework with user research through questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and expert workshops to explore young people's eating habits and technology usage.
    • Utilizing design tools (e.g., card-based design tools) to classify and analyze values, addressing the multilayered needs and value conflicts of youth groups.
    • Proposing potential design directions, including focusing on tradition preservation, balancing human touch with modern innovation, and promoting sustainable practices.
  • What are the innovative aspects of this solution?

    • Systematically integrating HFI and VSD for the first time, combining value-oriented and interdisciplinary design methods to provide a framework for evaluating food culture conflicts and potential design solutions.
    • Developing a value-based card tool to help experts extract design inspiration from users' perspectives and propose diverse technological solutions.
    • Employing the dynamic value structure model (Schwartz’s Value Theory) to interpret value conflicts, forming a foundation for balancing cultural preservation and technological applicability.
  • What are the implementation steps and key technologies used?

    1. Questionnaires and In-depth Interviews: Targeting young people born between 1999-2004, collecting data on their cooking habits, technology usage, and cultural perspectives.
      • Data analysis employed descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, extracting 38 core values and forming five major themes.
    2. Value-based Workshops:
      • (1) The first workshop involved designers testing and improving the card-based tool.
      • (2) The second workshop engaged interdisciplinary experts to discuss design solutions, exploring how technology can support culture and innovation in young people's diets.
    3. Data Analysis and Tool Iteration: Using Schwartz's dynamic value structure theory to evaluate the five major themes and their potential value conflicts.
      • Insights were extracted and refined through the card classification tool and reflective thematic analysis involving expert participation.
    4. Designing Potential Solutions: The team proposed multiple technology-integrated traditional solutions, such as AI-supported recipe curation, social media applications, and heritage transmission systems.

Research Findings

  • What specific results were achieved?

    • Identified five major value themes among young people: "preservation of food cultural heritage and relationships," "technological convenience," "customization and personalization," "globalization of food," and "sustainable choices and trust."
    • Through interdisciplinary discussions and design tools, several innovative design suggestions were generated, including:
      • An AI-driven recipe preservation robot;
      • A social media platform to promote cross-cultural communication and intergenerational technology transfer;
      • Digital preservation of traditional recipes and personalized recommendation algorithms.
    • Clarified five major value conflicts, such as the tension between technological convenience and cultural recipe preservation, the imbalance between sustainability and fast consumption habits, and the opposition between human touch and technological standardization.
  • What are the advantages compared to existing solutions?

    • By using VSD as an analytical framework, the study implemented a socio-culturally inclusive approach to technology development, avoiding purely technology-driven research solutions.
    • Enriched HFI research by addressing the gap in technology innovation strategies based on youth lifestyles and cultural heritage.
    • Provided a cross-regional design tool (e.g., value cards) to help experts from various fields design human-centered technological solutions.
  • What were the experimental or evaluation results?

    • Through questionnaire analysis and expert workshops, four key value-related contradictions were identified, and resolution pathways were proposed:
      1. Preserving traditional cooking techniques through smart devices.
      2. Promoting sustainable ecological farming and using technology to enhance local product promotion.
      3. Balancing globalization trends and localized food styles with AI-based personalized recommendations.
      4. Collaborating with social media platforms to strengthen the symbiosis of traditional and modern food cultures.
  • Limitations and Future Directions

    • Limitations:
      • Lack of participants from cross-cultural and rural backgrounds, potentially overlooking dietary habits and cultural conflicts in different social contexts.
      • Exclusion of in-depth perspectives from vegetarians or groups with specific dietary preferences, limiting the exploration of diverse habits.
      • Absence of social scientists (e.g., anthropologists or historians), which could have provided deeper insights into the dynamic changes between technology and culture.
    • Future Directions:
      • Expanding research to different cultural and geographical contexts to gain design insights from a global perspective.
      • Investigating other generational groups to understand how technology facilitates cultural cognition across age groups.
      • Testing the proposed design solutions in real-world environments to evaluate their practical effectiveness and social impact.

In summary, this study innovatively integrates the VSD and HFI frameworks to deeply explore young people's eating habits, technology usage, and value conflicts, providing feasible and meaningful insights for designers and technology developers. This not only helps preserve endangered food cultures but also promotes harmonious and beneficial human-technology interactions in the domain of food.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/189215/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713900
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Participatory Design, Food Culture & Food Interaction
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers