Beyond the Waiting Room: Patient's Perspectives on the Conversational Nuances of Pre-Consultation Chatbots

Conversational ChatbotsHuman-LLM CollaborationMental Health Apps & Online Support CommunitiesPhysicians, Nurses & CliniciansPsychiatrists & Psychotherapists

Literature Title

Beyond the Waiting Room: Patient’s Perspectives on the Conversational Nuances of Pre-Consultation Chatbots

Literature Information

  • Domain: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Medical Informatics
  • Keywords: LLMs, Chatbots, Primary Care, Information Gathering, Patient Registration

Research Background and Issues

  • Problems or Challenges:

    • Traditional human-led pre-consultation methods provide personalized interactions but demand significant time and effort from medical staff.
    • Patients often experience "survey fatigue" with conventional questionnaires, leading to lower-quality information and perceptions of being "too simplistic" or "not tailored to individual circumstances."
    • Chatbots powered by large language models (LLMs) can collect information in a conversational manner similar to human interactions, but their performance in clinical settings remains underexplored.
  • Significance of the Study:

    • Pre-consultation can enhance patient preparedness for appointments and help physicians make more targeted diagnoses.
    • Implementing pre-consultation via chatbots can reduce labor costs while improving system efficiency.
  • Research Motivation:

    • Existing studies have explored feasible chatbot models but have not focused on patient acceptance of these chatbots in clinical environments.
    • This study aims to fill this gap and provide guidance for designing chatbot-based pre-consultation systems in the future.

Solution

  • Methods and Implementation:

    • Designed two different pre-consultation chatbots:
      1. An AI agent powered by GPT-4.
      2. A "Wizard-of-Oz Agent" operated by medical professionals.
    • Provided fixed scripts, allowing the chatbots to dynamically adjust questions based on the conversation with patients.
    • Evaluated 33 participants in a real-world walk-in clinic setting, observing their reactions under both conditions.
  • Innovations:

    • Compared patient acceptance, interaction effectiveness, and experiential differences between the AI agent and the medical professional-simulated chatbot.
    • The study goes beyond technical performance, delving into patients' psychological experiences, feedback, and the socio-technical context.

Research Findings

  • Specific Findings:

    • Patients generally held a positive attitude toward chatbot-based pre-consultation, with similar performance observed under both conditions.
    • While the AI agent could moderately adjust question order and provide background explanations, it underperformed compared to the Wizard agent in terms of probing depth.
    • Patients felt the conversations helped them prepare for face-to-face consultations with doctors and enhanced their ability to articulate their conditions.
  • Advantages:

    • Compared to traditional questionnaires, chatbots simulate real-time interactive conversations, reducing patient fatigue.
    • The AI agent provided more explanations about the pre-consultation process, helping patients better understand the overall procedure.
  • Experiment and Evaluation Results:

    • Patients rated the dialogue quality of both agents highly, particularly appreciating the logical flow of questions and language fluency.
    • The Wizard agent excelled in depth of questioning and follow-up, while the AI agent tended to offer more empathetic language, though sometimes appearing repetitive and less authentic.
    • Unlike the static design of traditional questionnaires, chatbots demonstrated greater flexibility and content-driven focus during information gathering.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Patients suggested that chatbots should provide a summary at the end of the conversation and allow for modifications or additions to correct potential errors.
    • The AI agent was less effective than the simulated professional agent in certain details; future improvements should focus on enhancing the chatbot's ability to probe further and handle multiple conditions logically.
    • Proposed further research on integrating chatbots with electronic health record (EHR) systems to optimize healthcare resources while ensuring data privacy and accuracy.

Conclusion

This study enriches the understanding of pre-consultation chatbot design through empirical research in walk-in clinic scenarios. The findings indicate significant potential for using chatbots in medical pre-consultation, though optimization of language models is needed to improve information depth and interaction authenticity. Additionally, incorporating user expectation management and privacy safeguards into the pre-consultation process will be critical for driving future adoption of this technology.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/147742/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3641913
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
8 authors
sell
Subtopics
Conversational Chatbots, Human-LLM Collaboration, Mental Health Apps & Online Support Communities
work
Professions
Physicians, Nurses & Clinicians, Psychiatrists & Psychotherapists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers