"I'm gonna KMS": From Imminent Risk to Youth Joking about Suicide and Self-Harm via Social Media
Authors
Online Harassment & Counter-ToolsPsychiatrists & PsychotherapistsSocial Workers
Title of the Paper
“I’m gonna KMS:” From Imminent Risk to Youth Joking about Suicide and Self-Harm via Social Media
Bibliographic Information
- Topic Area: Representation, impact, and recommendations regarding youth discussions of self-harm and suicide on social media
- Keywords: youth, social media, self-harm, suicide, mental health, Instagram, privacy, peer support, risk detection
Research Background and Problem Statement
-
Identified Issues or Challenges:
- The sharing of self-harm and suicide-related content by youth on social media platforms may lead to the spread of dangerous behaviors (e.g., suicide contagion) or the normalization of self-harm, posing a public health concern.
- Existing studies in the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) field often rely on public data or surveys, which may not adequately capture how youth discuss these topics in private conversations.
- Current technologies struggle to differentiate between youth using "suicide language" humorously or as exaggerated expressions versus genuinely dangerous scenarios, resulting in high false-positive rates.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Youth suicide is a critical global public health issue.
- Previous studies have primarily focused on the representation and impact of youth self-harm and suicide behaviors on public social media. However, private conversations remain underexplored.
- The authors aim to analyze private Instagram messages to uncover how youth genuinely discuss self-harm and suicide, thereby aiding the development of timely and accurate risk detection and intervention measures.
Proposed Solution
-
Methodology or Proposed Solution:
- Utilize an ecological sample dataset donated by youth users, consisting of private Instagram conversations.
- Conduct qualitative research using thematic analysis to identify key patterns, themes, and contexts in youth discussions about self-harm and suicide.
-
Innovative Contributions:
- The first study to examine youth private conversations about self-harm and suicide, uncovering deeper meanings behind their language.
- Propose design recommendations to balance supporting healthy discussions among youth while monitoring or limiting online dangerous content, avoiding excessive censorship or false alarms.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Dataset filtering: Extract 1,224 conversations related to self-harm/suicide from English-language youth Instagram messages and divide them into 2,019 sub-conversations.
- Analytical approach: Conduct thematic analysis of conversation content, categorized by the following research questions (RQs):
- How do youth discuss their personal experiences with self-harm/suicide?
- How do youth discuss third-party self-harm/suicide behaviors?
- How do youth use "self-harm/suicide language" humorously or exaggeratedly?
Research Findings
-
Specific Findings:
-
RQ Summaries:
- RQ1 (Personal experiences): 23% of sub-conversations involved youth disclosing their current or past self-harm/suicide behaviors, including sharing immediate dangerous thoughts, reflecting on past actions, or celebrating recovery.
- RQ2 (Third-party experiences): 7% of conversations involved gossiping about or intervening in others' behaviors, defending against or technically avoiding exposure to triggering content.
- RQ3 (Humor and exaggerated expressions): 70% of sub-conversations used "self-harm/suicide language" as a form of humor or emotional expression rather than indicating genuine risk.
-
Proposed specific design recommendations for social media platforms:
- Create "trust circles" to provide youth with a safe and supportive community.
- Implement context-aware interventions to offer timely assistance and support resources in dangerous situations.
- Encourage youth to adopt less violent language through educational nudges (e.g., "prompt design").
-
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Provides nuanced insights into private online conversations, complementing existing studies focused solely on public data.
- Guides social media platforms to design algorithms that better account for context and linguistic complexity, reducing false positives.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Data revealed that exaggerated and humorous "self-harm/suicide language" is a common communication method among youth, potentially masking genuinely dangerous behaviors.
- Youth often rely on peer support, including comforting friends in risky situations or creating mutual intervention plans.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Data is solely from Instagram and limited to U.S. users, potentially excluding other platforms or broader cultural contexts.
- No comprehensive analysis exists on the differences in "suicide language" usage across age groups or cultural backgrounds.
- Future research is recommended to explore other platforms and incorporate more diverse youth datasets to validate the findings' generalizability.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How do adolescents discuss their personal self-harm/suicide experiences in private Instagram conversations?Category: Misinformation, Platform Harm, Risk, and TrustSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do adolescents discuss third parties' self-harm/suicide behavior in private conversations?Category: Misinformation, Platform Harm, Risk, and TrustSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do adolescents use 'self-harm/suicide language' humorously or hyperbolically?Category: Misinformation, Platform Harm, Risk, and TrustSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Social media platforms struggle to accurately identify genuine self-harm/suicide risk in adolescent expression.Category: Misinformation, Platform Harm, Risk, and TrustSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642489
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Online Harassment & Counter-Tools
work
Professions
Psychiatrists & Psychotherapists, Social Workers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers