Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information Workers
Best PaperAuthors
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & AutomationWorkplace Wellbeing & Work StressUI/UX Designers
Document Title
Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information Workers
Document Information
- Subject Area: Understanding and designing AI applications for managing the wellbeing of information workers
- Keywords: Information work, AI adoption, passive sensing, digital representation, technological impact, risks and benefits, human resource management, worker health, mental health
Research Background and Problem
- Problem or Challenge: Information workers (IW) in technology and media fields face significant stress. Passive sensing-driven AI (PSAI) systems utilize behavioral traces to infer workers' performance and psychological states, but these technologies also raise concerns about privacy risks, misuse, and adoption resistance.
- Importance: As work environments undergo digital transformation, understanding workers' acceptance and resistance to these technologies is crucial to ensuring that such systems support worker wellbeing rather than exacerbate burdens.
- Research Motivation and Related Work: The design of PSAI systems often neglects workers' perspectives, leading to concerns about privacy and fairness. This study aims to optimize technology design from the workers' viewpoint to better serve wellbeing objectives.
Solution
- Proposed Method or Solution:
- The authors adopt a worker-centric approach, conducting scenario-based experiments to investigate how four key features of PSAI system design (data sensing mode, sensing scope, inference type, and data sharing method) influence worker acceptance.
- A linear mixed-effects model is employed to analyze workers' attitudes toward PSAI, while assessing the potential risks and benefits of its design and implementation.
- Innovation: The study introduces an analytical framework that dissects data sensing, inference forms, and information-sharing mechanisms into independent yet interrelated factors, systematically quantifying workers' attitudes and acceptance thresholds through experiments.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Scenario Design: Develop scenario-based evaluation questionnaires incorporating randomized combinations of sensing modes, scopes, inference goals, and sharing methods.
- Data Collection and Analysis: 110 information workers participated in the experiment, completing a total of 1059 scenario evaluations.
- Statistical Modeling: Use linear mixed-effects models to examine the impact of each scenario component on workers' perceived benefits and harms.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Findings:
- Sensing Mode:
- PSAI systems that record digital usage time and physical activities are perceived as more valuable and less harmful.
- Technologies utilizing online language data and visual stream data are less readily accepted by workers.
- Sensing Scope:
- Sensing methods limited to work-related contexts are preferred for certain data sources (e.g., online language).
- Inference Type:
- PSAI systems designed for assessing mental health (e.g., stress evaluation) are more acceptable to workers compared to systems focused on performance evaluation.
- Data Sharing Method:
- Workers favor receiving analysis results personally or sharing them in anonymized aggregated formats. Direct sharing with managers or other individuals is less accepted.
- Sensing Mode:
- Advantages: Provides PSAI design guidelines based on worker wellbeing needs, mitigating privacy and trust risks.
- Experiment or Evaluation Results: Few PSAI system design scenarios achieved positive acceptance, indicating that most current implementations require optimization.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- The study relies on hypothetical scenarios, lacking validation in real-world behavior.
- Comprehensive analysis of multimodal sensing systems remains insufficient.
- Future Directions:
- Extend research to the use of PSAI in contexts such as government policies and economic crises.
- Strengthen cross-national comparative studies to explore adoption differences across regions and cultural backgrounds.
- Develop more transparent PSAI systems, enhancing interpretability and worker participation.
- Limitations:
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How do sensing modes, scope, inference types, and data sharing methods of passive sensing AI (PSAI) systems affect information workers' acceptance?Category: Activity Recognition Datasets, Annotation, and Explainability MethodsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What are information workers' main concerns about privacy and fairness in PSAI systems?Category: Activity Recognition Datasets, Annotation, and Explainability MethodsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can PSAI design be optimized to better support information workers' mental health and work needs?Category: Activity Recognition Datasets, Annotation, and Explainability MethodsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Information workers worry about privacy leakage and unfair use when accepting PSAI systems.Category: Activity Recognition Datasets, Annotation, and Explainability MethodsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642716
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
Best Paper
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation, Workplace Wellbeing & Work Stress
work
Professions
UI/UX Designers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers