Understanding Socio-technical Opportunities for Enhancing Communication Between Older Adults and their Remote Family

Aging-in-Place Assistance SystemsCommunity Engagement & Civic TechnologySocial WorkersElderly Care WorkersFamily Caregivers

Document Title

Understanding Socio-technical Opportunities for Enhancing Communication Between Older Adults and Their Remote Family

Document Information

  • Subject Areas: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Socio-technical Design, Intergenerational Communication, and Elderly Well-being
  • Keywords: Older adults, intergenerational communication, computer-mediated communication, non-Western culture, dispersed families

Research Background and Issues

  1. Problems or Challenges:

    • Communication between older adults and younger family members living far away due to geographical or social reasons is challenging, potentially threatening the psychological and social well-being of older adults.
    • Existing communication technologies fail to adequately meet the needs of older adults, especially in adapting to age-related differences in skills.
  2. Significance:

    • Against the backdrop of societal aging and family dispersion, intergenerational communication is increasingly recognized for its positive impact on the quality of life and mental health of older adults.
    • Exploring mediated communication between older adults and their families from a socio-technical perspective can provide new directions for design.
  3. Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • Traditional technology design often stereotypes older adults as "technologically illiterate," overlooking their social and psychological needs.
    • There is a need for more empirical support for human-centered design approaches, incorporating non-Western perspectives to uncover social dynamics and design insights.

Solutions

  1. Proposed Methods or Solutions:

    • Conduct qualitative research to uncover the characteristics of communication between older adults and remote family members, as well as the role of social service volunteers.
    • Analyze social dynamics from the perspective of multiple stakeholders and propose technological design recommendations.
  2. Innovative Aspects:

    • Integrating the design of intergenerational communication technologies with real-world social dynamics, identifying design opportunities from the perspective of older adults' psychological well-being and social integration.
    • Promoting dynamic and context-adaptive solutions.
  3. Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:

    • Participant Recruitment: Select 9 family groups and 8 volunteers from Chinese families and community service organizations.
    • Data Collection: Conduct semi-structured interviews to explore motivations, challenges, and future visions of technology-supported intergenerational communication.
    • Data Analysis: Use open coding and affinity diagramming methods to extract themes, identifying 223 open codes categorized into 18 themes.

Research Findings

  1. Specific Findings:

    • Summarized types of social relationships in intergenerational communication, including "older adult-dominated relationships," "reversed social roles," and "friend-like relationships."
    • Proposed the impact of remote communication patterns and technological interventions, including differentiated analysis of communication frequency, topics, and methods.
  2. Advantages Over Existing Solutions:

    • Identified "appropriate digital social distance" and "conflicts between communication expression and intent" as core issues for design responses.
    • Expanded the potential applications of asynchronous communication and non-verbal contextual technologies.
  3. Experimental or Evaluation Results:

    • Remote communication patterns between older adults and younger family members are largely influenced by technological functions, social roles, and cultural factors.
    • Social service volunteers cannot fully replace family roles but play a critical role in supporting technology use and service design.
  4. Limitations and Future Directions:

    • The sample is biased toward urban older adults and highly educated children, not fully representative of broader socio-economic backgrounds.
    • Insufficient exploration of grandparent-grandchild relationships; future research should enrich role types and multi-party communication contexts.
    • Advocates combining quantitative and qualitative research to explore more generalizable conclusions.

Discussion and Design Recommendations

  1. Design Directions:

    • Appropriate Digital Social Distance: Design solutions should not overly emphasize intimacy but provide users with the autonomy to adjust their level of interaction, meeting individual needs for independence.
    • Harmonizing Communication Intent and Expression: Use environmental technologies and physical interactions to compensate for the absence of non-verbal cues.
    • Engaging in Shared Activities: Leverage immersive technologies or IoT to extend everyday interaction scenarios, fostering long-term engagement among family members.
    • Community-Integrated Design: Connect family and community resources to support older adults' "aging in place" lifestyle, positioning the community as a core focus of technological design.
  2. Cultural Adaptation Reflections:

    • The Chinese cultural emphasis on "filial piety" and relatively restrained emotional expression may limit the promotion of certain behaviors, requiring careful consideration for cross-cultural applicability.
  3. Future Research Directions:

    • Recruit samples from more diverse backgrounds to explore the technological design needs of relationships between grandparents, parents, and children.
    • Incorporate multi-party communication scenarios to enrich technological adaptability.
    • Supplement qualitative findings with quantitative research to provide generalizable scientific evidence for policy and practical applications.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/146735/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642318
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Aging-in-Place Assistance Systems, Community Engagement & Civic Technology
work
Professions
Social Workers, Elderly Care Workers, Family Caregivers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
3 related papers