P7 - Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles
Authors
With increasing automation, occupants of fully autonomous vehicles are likely to be completely disengaged from the driving task. However, even with no driving involved, there are still activities that will require interfaces between the vehicle and passengers. This study evaluated different configurations of screens providing operational-related information to occupants for tracking the progress of journeys. Surveys and interviews were used to measure trust, usability, workload and experience after users were driven by an autonomous low speed pod. Results showed that participants want to monitor the state of the vehicle and see details about the ride, including a map of the route and related information. There was a preference for this information to be displayed via an onboard touchscreen device combined with an overhead letterbox display versus a smartphone-based interface. This paper provides recommendations for the design of devices with the potential to improve the user interaction with future autonomous vehicles.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Fly Away: Evaluating the Impact of Motion Fidelity on Optimized User Interface Design via Bayesian Optimization in Automated Urban Air Mobility Simulations
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
Toward Immersive Self-Driving Simulations: Reports from a User Study across Six Platforms
CHI '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
A Wizard of Oz Study on Passengers’ Experiences of a Robo-Taxi Service in Real-Life Settings
DIS '20· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
P5 - Eliciting Driver Stress Using Naturalistic Driving Scenarios On Real Roads
AutoUI '18· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
Gliding on Simulated Ice: Effect of Low-μ Emulation on Drift Training
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)