Drowsiness Detection and Warning in Manual and Automated Driving: Results from Subjective Evaluation
Authors
Drowsiness is a main cause of serious traffic accidents, and problematic within the ongoing automation of the driving task. Several approaches for drowsiness detection have been published and are in operation in production cars for manual driving. To assess differences in the development of drowsiness between manual and automated driving, and to further investigate the potential of subjective ratings, we conducted a driving simulator study (N=30). The self-assessment was based on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), during and after driving. Furthermore, we examined the impact of travel time and driver age (20-25, 65-70 years). Results confirm that driving mode and travel time have a significant effect on the development of drowsiness. In both age groups, self-ratings were higher for automated driving and particularly by younger subjects. All subjects estimated themselves drowsier during driving. The gained knowledge can be helpful for the development of future driver-vehicle interfaces in driver drowsiness detection.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
Unveiling Road Rage Dynamics: Recreating and Modeling Road Rage in Audiovisual and Simulating Environments Based on Real-World Footage
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 80%
Decoding Driver Intention Cues: Exploring Non-verbal Communication for Human-Centered Automotive Interfaces
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
Evaluating In-Car Tasks’ Distraction Effects with Drive-In Lab
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
Understanding User Requirements for Creating Sensor-Powered Smart Car Cabins Through Retrofitting
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
A Review on the Development of the In-Vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces in Driving Automation: A Design Perspective
AutoUI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 80%
Designing With Motion: Exploring Vestibular Cues as a Subtle Awareness Nudge Modality in Automated Vehicles
AutoUI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
In UX We Trust: Investigation of Aesthetics and Usability of Driver-Vehicle Interfaces and Their Impact on the Perception of Automated Driving
CHI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
- 67%
One Size Does Not Fit All: Designing and Evaluating Criticality-Adaptive Displays in Highly Automated Vehicles
CHI '24· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 67%
Multi-Modal eHMIs: The Relative Impact of Light and Sound in AV-Pedestrian Interaction
CHI '24· External HMI (eHMI) — Communication with Pedestrians & Cyclists +1
- 67%
Matching Explanation Detail to Scene Complexity: Studying Situational Awareness-Specific AI Feedback in Pedestrian Encounter Driving Scenarios
CHI '26· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)