Evaluating Interfaces for Non-Driving Related Tasks While Operating an E-scooter

In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal FeedbackMicromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) InteractionCyclists (Bicycle / E-bike / E-scooter)

Micromobility vehicles, such as e-scooters, provide ecological and financial benefits over automotive transportation. However, as with car drivers, micromobility users often perform non-driving related tasks (NDRTs), interacting with stereo controls or navigation tasks, which can lead to accidents. It remains unclear what control interfaces are appropriate and safe for micromobility. We evaluated six interface modalities for NDRTs and conducted a within-subjects study with 35 participants (yielding n=210 observations) in an e-scooter simulator to compare modality safety and preferences. Our results align with existing work on gaze and tactility in the automotive NDRTs context. However, unique to e-scooters, interfaces that required users to alter their grip on the handlebars were less preferred as they compromised stability. Social comfort also emerged as a critical factor due to concerns about public visibility. This work aims to encourage the design of safer, more socially acceptable interfaces for e-scooters and other emerging micromobility vehicles.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/auto_ui/205176/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
AutoUI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback, Micromobility (E-bike, E-scooter) Interaction
work
Professions
Cyclists (Bicycle / E-bike / E-scooter)
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers